SPECIAL | Why losing trust in expertise threatens democracy
The Excerpt
USA TODAY
4.1 • 1.2K Ratings
🗓️ 18 September 2025
⏱️ 13 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
From “follow the science” during COVID to universities accused of activism, the gap between experts and the public is widening. Roger Pielke Jr. explains why expertise doesn’t just mean a PhD, how media silos deepen divides, and why experts must serve all Americans—not just those who share their politics.
* Please note, this interview was recorded on 8/19/25
Have feedback on the show? Please send us an email at podcasts@usatoday.com.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, I'm Dana Taylor, and this is a special episode of USA Today's The Excerpt. |
| 0:17.6 | What happened when we stopped trusting experts? This isn't just a philosophical question. Partisan battles have crept into nearly every facet of American society, from science to entertainment. Political scientist Roger Pelke Jr. argues it's not just bad for science. It's dangerous for democracy itself. Roger is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and the author |
| 0:39.6 | of the Substack, The Honest Broker. Thanks for joining me, Roger. Dana, great to be with you. |
| 0:44.9 | You write that democracy as a collaboration between experts and non-experts, citing the early |
| 0:49.9 | 20th century political scientist, Omar Eric Schetznyder. How is this dynamic between those who are |
| 0:56.5 | experts and those who aren't evolved in the digital age? Yeah, we have this crazy idea in our |
| 1:02.5 | society that anyone can participate in the political process, all of us who are eligible can vote, |
| 1:08.5 | any of us can run for office that are eligible and be elected, |
| 1:11.2 | and you don't have to be an expert in anything. At the same time, to make society go, to make |
| 1:15.3 | society function, we need air traffic control, we need nuclear power plants, we have to deliver |
| 1:19.7 | clean water, we have to protect the environment. We had to have a military, and that requires |
| 1:24.0 | considerable expertise. And so it is a real fundamental aspect of modern democracy |
| 1:30.9 | that as society becomes more technologically oriented, the tensions between democratic governance, |
| 1:37.6 | everyone, and the necessary role of expertise, a very specialized group, is going to be in |
| 1:43.0 | some kind of attention. And that's just |
| 1:44.8 | become more pronounced in the 21st century. You emphasize that expertise is not synonymous with |
| 1:50.0 | credentials, such as a college degree, a PhD, or an MD. Can you explain what you mean by that? |
| 1:57.0 | Yeah, experts can be found all throughout society and all sorts of roles. Sometimes we fall into |
| 2:02.1 | the trap of thinking that you have to go to an elite university or you have to be wearing a lab coat |
| 2:06.0 | to be an expert in something. But there's plenty of people who in their day-to-day jobs have |
| 2:10.7 | expertise, whether they're farmers or electricians or mechanics or mothers or fathers. Functioning in |
| 2:16.7 | society requires a lot of specialized expertise |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from USA TODAY, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of USA TODAY and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

