This is the Daily Blast from the New Republic, produced and presented by the DSR Network.

I'm your host, Greg Sargent.

The fate of dozens of Venezuelans deported by the Trump administration to a maximum security prison in El Salvador remains in doubt.

So does the fate of Kilmar Abrago-Garcia, who administration officials admit

was removed in error, even as they refused to bring them back to the United States.

The Supreme Court issued rulings on these cases this week, putting a hold on a lower court's

order to reverse the removal of Abrago-Garcia

and allowing the deportations of Venezuelans to resume for now.

In that second one, Sonia Sotomayor issued a powerful dissent,

and buried in it is caused for real alarm,

because it signals a way in which these horrors might get much worse.

Today we're talking about all of this to one of the best out there at demystifying this kind of thing,

American Immigration Council Senior Fellow Aaron Reiklin Melnick.

Aaron, thanks for coming on, man.

Thank you for having me.

So the Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling that had stopped Trump's deportations of

Venezuelans, which he had undertaken pursuant to the Alien Enemy's Act of 1798.

Dozens of them had been removed without any due process, and the administration has failed to

show that a number of them are even members of the Trend de Aragua gang, as it alleged.

Now, Aaron, the court did say that all nine of the justices agree that these migrants deserve

due process. The only question is which court at Hadanson. Can you sum up where we are on this?

Yeah, so this case made it to the Supreme Court with the Trump administration arguing

...