And no parent should be told by doctors that their child won't be happy unless they undergo irreversible surgeries.

No child's gender is a mistake because every child is made in the image of God.

Medical decisions.

Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the court, on its face, SB1 bans medical care only

when it is inconsistent with a person's birth sex.

An adolescent can receive medical treatment to live and identify as a boy if his birth sex is male but not female. And an adolescent can receive medical

treatment to live and identify as a girl if her birth sex is female but not male. Tennessee claims

this sex-based line drawing is justified to protect children. But SB1 has taken away the only

treatment that relieved years of suffering for each of the

adolescent plaintiffs.

Hey, fam, it's me, Amara. Welcome to the TransLash Podcast, a show where we tell trans stories

to save trans lives. While we at the TransLash Podcast, a show where we tell trans stories to save trans lives.

While we at the TransLash podcast hope that you had a restful and restorative Thanksgiving,

that's because after a consequential presidential election, this week, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in a consequential

case, that of U.S. v. Scrametti, which was heard on Wednesday, just the day before

this is getting to your ears.

Now, I was in the chamber to hear the oral arguments in this historic case, which ostensibly is designed to answer the question

of whether or not gender affirming care for trans youths is protected by the Constitution. If the court

rules that it is, then gender affirming care for trans kids will proceed as it does at present.

If they decide that it is unconstitutional, then it could be

banned outright. So that's why I wanted to talk to two people who can help us break all of these

consequences down, what we heard in court yesterday, and begin to just prepare us for this landmark

...