meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Serious Inquiries Only

SIO33: Thinking Clearly on Syria

Serious Inquiries Only

Thomas Smith

News, Atheism, Skepticism, Democrat, Left, Liberal, Politics, News Commentary, Progressive, Religion

4.61K Ratings

🗓️ 17 April 2017

⏱️ 62 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

I support Trump's Syria strike against the Shayrat airfield. That is the punchline of today's episode but I encourage you to listen with an open mind as I go through the reaction to the Syria strike, what different pundits and columnists and congresspersons have said, and why I think ultimately it was a good idea. There's a lot of muddy and motivated thinking going on in our public discourse; I'm doing my best to go where the facts lead. And as always, I'm very open to counter argument! Here are some selected sources: How Many Bombs Obama Dropped on Syria; Breakdown of Senate Support for the Strike; Congress Syria Statements 2013 vs 2017; Blatant Republican Hypocrisy on Syria; Opinion Piece Alleging Liberals 'Cooing' Over Trump; Shadi Hamid Avoiding Fallacies on Syria; Possible Anti-Trump Backlash in Special Elections Leave us a Voicemail: (916) 750-4746! Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/seriouspod Follow us on Twitter: @seriouspod Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/seriouspod For comments, email [email protected] Questions, Suggestions, Episode ideas? email: [email protected]

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're listening to serious inquiries only. Oh, Hello and I'm your host

0:33.6

Thomas Smith. All right today as promised the part two on Syria where I want to

0:40.1

talk about the reaction to Trump's action and what I think about it, what some other people think about it, and as I alluded to last episode, the answer may surprise you.

0:51.0

Click Beatty kind of thing that probably is not really effective as click-Bade.

0:56.6

But anyway, that's what I'm going to talk about.

0:58.1

I've got lots of time because I'm doing this early, I'm not doing it on Thursday.

1:04.0

There's not going to be a voicemail segment, so plenty of time to sit down and say everything that I've intended to say about Syria.

1:12.0

Oh, quick note, I've gotten this question a couple times

1:14.5

where people and I just got it after Thursday's episode hey why do you always say you're

1:20.7

running out of time or not always but why have you said you're running out of time in an episode

1:24.7

You're doing a podcast. It's not radio. Yeah, understood

1:30.1

Apologies if that upset some people but here's the thing with this

1:34.0

podcast being twice a week and with sharing a huge percentage of

1:39.1

listeners with opening arguments that's twice a week and with the amount of media and

1:44.2

podcast everybody's consuming I'm very sensitive to the fact that if if I over

1:48.8

saturate with content people just don't listen to it like there's just not enough

1:52.0

time in the week so I'm not going to do four hours of

1:55.8

podcasts in a week or something like that. I'm not going to release a two and a half

1:59.6

hour one unless there's like a real emergency. I'm shooting. I'm always shooting for 45 to 60 minutes.

2:05.7

That's my target because that's the amount that I think people and the tracking data I have

2:12.4

shows that that's what people actually listen to.

2:15.0

I'm not interested in putting out a bunch of content that only 10% of you are going to finish or something like that.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Thomas Smith, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Thomas Smith and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.