meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate's Spoiler Specials

Side Effects: Slate's Spoiler Special

Slate's Spoiler Specials

Slate Podcasts

Tv & Film, Tv Reviews, Film Reviews

3.6724 Ratings

🗓️ 7 February 2013

⏱️ 29 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Slate's Dana Stevens and Dan Kois discuss Side Effects.  WARNING: This podcast is meant to be heard AFTER you've seen the movie. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Slate Spoiler Specials are brought to you by Shutterstock.com.

0:03.9

With over 700,000 high-quality video clips,

0:07.0

Shutterstock helps you take your creative projects to the next level.

0:10.6

For 30% off your new account, go to Shutterstock.com and use the offer code, Spoiler 2.

0:17.6

I'm Dana Stevens here with a Slate Spoiler Special podcast on Side Effects, the new Steven Soderberg film.

0:23.0

Joining me from Slate's D.C. office is Dan Koyce. Hey, Dan.

0:26.2

Hi, Dana.

0:27.0

You are a senior editor at Slate.

0:28.9

I am in the culture department, and I fancy myself Slate's resident Soderbergologist, although with a caveat that I'm not sure if it's Soderbergologist or Soderberg

0:38.6

oligian. Or Soderbergian. Soderbergian. You are the R author of a completist, which is a feature

0:45.9

slate does, where they force some poor soul to watch every single movie or listen to every single

0:50.5

album or read every single book by a given artist, and you chose Steven Soderberg

0:54.4

for yours.

0:54.9

But I was not a poor soul because it was a very enjoyable experience. I watched all his movies

0:58.6

and then also watched every TV show that he's directed, as many short films of his that I

1:04.8

could find. You read his book. I read his book, his books. Yeah, the poor soul thing was

1:09.8

completely a joke. I can't wait to do a

1:11.1

completist myself and I'm constantly coming up with fantasy completists in my mind, but they do seem

1:14.9

very, very daunting. You're really steeped in that person's work for a long time. So has that made you

1:19.2

feel different permanently about Steven Soderberg? It's given me, I think, a lot more affection

1:23.4

for even his most foolish experiments because they seem all of a piece.

1:30.5

Once you sort of get the sense of the experimental verve that he brings to his projects

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.