meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Ezra Klein Show

Shame, Safety and Moving Beyond Cancel Culture

The Ezra Klein Show

New York Times Opinion

Society & Culture, Government, News

4.611K Ratings

🗓️ 27 April 2021

⏱️ 61 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

I’ve been thinking lately about how to move beyond the binary debate over cancel culture. And a good place to start is with the deeper question we’re all trying to ask: What is the kind of politics — the kind of society — we’re trying to achieve in our fights over acceptable speech? To talk through this question, I wanted to bring on two guests, both of whom have been canceled — one by the left and one by the right — and have since dedicated parts of their work to grappling with both the good and the bad of the phenomenon. When is cancellation merited or useful? When is it insufficient or harmful? And what other tools are available in those cases? Natalie Wynn runs the YouTube channel ContraPoints. Her videos, on topics ranging from cancel culture to J.K. Rowling, are not only intellectually stimulating and aesthetically rich but also deeply humanizing. What sets Wynn apart is a unique capacity to live inside the heads of those she disagrees with vehemently and bring them into a dialogue with her. Will Wilkinson was the vice president for research at the Niskanen Center. He was fired after a right-wing online mob attacked a clearly satirical tweet he’d sent. Since being canceled, Wilkinson has, surprisingly, become one of the most outspoken critics of the anti-cancel-culture discourse. He now writes the great newsletter Model Citizen, hosts a podcast of the same name and contributes to Times Opinion. The result is a very different kind of cancel culture conversation. We discuss the universal yearning for safe spaces, the psychology of the social media pile-on, the political limits of social shame, the pathways to persuasion and humanization, theories of social change, the virtues of an effective political communicator, how social media shapes the way we act and think online and much, much more. Mentioned in this episode: "A Different Way of Thinking About Cancel Culture" by Ezra Klein “Canceling” by ContraPoints “J.K. Rowling” by ContraPoints “Undefined Cancel Game” by Will Wilkinson “The Boring Truth vs ‘Cancel Culture’ Panic” by Will Wilkinson Recommendations: "Conflict is Not Abuse" by Sarah Schulman "The Tao is Silent" by Raymond Smullyan If you enjoyed this show, you should check out The Argument's recent episode: "Is It Time to Cancel Cancel Culture?" You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of "The Ezra Klein Show" at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast, and you can find Ezra on Twitter @ezraklein. Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at [email protected]. “The Ezra Klein Show” is produced by Rogé Karma and Jeff Geld; fact-checking by Michelle Harris; original music by Isaac Jones; mixing by Jeff Geld.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Mr. Klein and this is the Ezra Klein Show.

0:19.8

I always find myself in an uncomfortable place in the cancel culture debate.

0:24.0

I think fights over the boundaries of acceptable speech aren't just legitimate but they're

0:27.8

actually needed and overdue.

0:30.6

And I think the way they play out online leads to excesses, disproportionate punishments,

0:36.1

oftentimes the wrong people being targeted for the wrong things, and then over time a crappy

0:40.5

speech environment and a lot of political backlash for everyone.

0:44.2

So here I want to get beyond the cancel culture, is it real or fake, is it good or bad

0:49.4

debate?

0:50.4

There's something real that people are referring to when they talk about cancel culture, and

0:54.4

it's both good and bad, there are good parts and there are bad parts.

0:58.0

And so the deeper question is what do we actually want to achieve here and how do we

1:00.9

go about achieving it?

1:02.7

For me, and I'm the only person I can answer for, it's a world in which we speak about

1:07.4

each other more respectfully in which we listen to each other more openly, and that becomes

1:11.7

a foundation and this part is important, it becomes a foundation for a fair and more

1:16.3

inclusive politics for more people to get to shape how they are spoken about.

1:20.0

And social shame delivered through social media, it is going to be part of that.

1:24.2

It will be and it should be too few people have decided the boundaries unacceptable speech

1:29.8

for too long and part of what we're going through now is an important renegotiation of

1:33.6

that.

1:34.9

That renegotiation will just have to take place through social means, including shame.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New York Times Opinion, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of New York Times Opinion and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.