This is the Hidden Killers podcast with Tony Bruske and continuing coverage of the case against Brian Koberger.

So here's the move Brian Koeberger's legal team just tried to pull.

They walked into court and they said essentially, we can't fight what we can't see.

And because of that, the court should strike the death penalty.

What do they mean by what they can't see?

Bold strategy, right?

You think they'd be saying, you know, they're not giving us what we need.

It's actually quite the opposite of that.

We'll talk about it in just one second. But first, be sure to press subscribe wherever you are watching this on YouTube so you don't miss any of our coverage on this case.

Comment.

We'd love to hear your thoughts on it.

Give us your insight.

Give us what your thoughts are.

It can be different than mine.

It can be different than the others. That's fine.

That's how we have a dialogue and that's how we learn and grow and understand these cases better,

as long as the arguments make sense and they're not just pulled out of thin air.

So please do that. And if you're listening on the podcast, press subscribe wherever you're listening

there. We do greatly appreciate that. And also do check at our YouTube where you can join in on the podcast, press subscribe wherever you're listening there. We do greatly appreciate that.

And also do check at our YouTube where you can join in on the conversation. So their argument,

it wasn't about innocence or guilt. It was not about a new piece of DNA or even a surprise

witness for that matter. It was about the volume, the sheer bulk of what the

...