I'm Elizabeth Lattery and welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court,

what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government.

Today I'm joined by my heritage colleague, John Michael Seibler.

Hey, Elizabeth, thanks for having me back.

Yeah, thanks for coming once again.

So the Supreme Court is back after a two-week break.

The court recently granted cert in three new cases.

And let me tell you, it's an exciting bunch.

First up, we have Return Mail Inc. versus U.S. Postal Service.

And the question is whether the government is a person who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy Smith, America and Vents Act.

Rividing, I know.

And then we have mission product holding versus tempnology, not technology, it's tempnology.

I thought it was a typo when I first saw it.

And the question there is whether under the bankruptcy code, a debtor licensers rejection of a license agreement

terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensers breach under applicable non-bankruptcy law.

You know, someone somewhere is very interested in that case.

That would not be me.

But finally, there's United States against Heyman, a case that involves supervised release

after imprisonment. It asks whether the Tenth Circuit erred in holding unconstitutional and

unenforceable, the portions of a statute 18 U.S.C. Section 3583K. They require the district court

to revoke this respondent's 10-year term of supervised release

and to impose five years of re-imprisonment following a finding by preponderance of the evidence

...