This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

Slack.com slash DHQ.

This is CBS, I'm John Bachelbert with Professor Richard Epstein of the Hoover Institution,

a senior fellow. And Richard is kind enough to comment on something he's not yet written

on, but I look to the future. This is a new chapter. Oh, I have written on it. Oh,

excuse me, Richard, more versus Harper. Just argued or arguments before the Supreme Court.

And this turns on the authority of a state Supreme Court versus the authority of a state

legislature. The case had hand here is North Carolina, but many other states have been

in the news for reversals or amendations of the state election law. Right now, Richard,

what do you expect the court to, how do you expect the court to respond to whether the

state Supreme Court is or is not empowered to correct the state legislature?

I think they're going to say that that's impromissible, but they're going to have a great deal

of trouble finding the remedy. Let me go back to the clause to begin with because I think

there's a surprise at the end. The times, places, manners of holding, stress the word holding

elections, the centers and representatives shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature

there will. Okay. Note that what they're talking about is time, place, and manners of holding

election. I have actually written elsewhere that I don't think holding elections includes

district and kinds of decisions and that those things would then be left to the state

...