meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Rabbi Sacks Legacy

Sages and Saints (Rabbi Sacks on Naso, Covenant & Conversation)

The Rabbi Sacks Legacy

Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks

Religion & Spirituality

4.8627 Ratings

🗓️ 1 June 2022

⏱️ 11 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Welcome to Rabbi Sacks' commentary on the weekly Torah portion. This series of Covenant & Conversation essays examines the ethics we can derive from the Torah, week-by-week, parsha by parsha. You can find the full written article on Naso available to read, print, and share, by visiting: rabbisacks.org/covenant-conversation/naso/sages-and-saints/ For more articles, videos, and other material from Rabbi Sacks, please visit www.RabbiSacks.org and follow @RabbiSacks. The Rabbi Sacks Legacy Trust continues to share weekly inspiration from Rabbi Sacks. This piece was originally written and recorded by Rabbi Sacks in 2015. Covenant & Conversation on Ethics is kindly supported by the Maurice Wohl Charitable Foundation in memory of Maurice and Vivienne Wohl z”l.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Sages and Saints. Parachat Nassau contains the laws of the Nazirite, the individual who undertook

0:09.6

to observe special rules of holiness and abstinence, not to drink wine or other intoxicants,

0:15.7

including anything made from grapes, not have his hair cut and not to defile himself by contact with the dead.

0:22.6

Such a state was usually undertaken for a limited period. The standard length was 30 days.

0:28.6

There were exceptions, most famously Samson and Samuel, who because of the miraculous nature of

0:34.4

their birth, were consecrated before birth as Nazarites for life. What the

0:40.7

terror doesn't make clear, though, is number one, why a person might wish to undertake this

0:46.1

form of abstinence, and number two, whether it considers this choice to be commendable or merely

0:52.1

permissible. On the one hand, the terror calls the Nazarite holy to God.

0:57.7

On the other, it requires him at the end of his period to bring a sin offering. This led to an

1:04.3

ongoing disagreement between the rabbis in Mishnec, Talmudic and medieval times. According to Rabbi Elieuza and later to Nakhmanides,

1:13.5

the Nazarite is praiseworthy. He is voluntarily undertaken a higher level of holiness.

1:20.4

The prophet Amos said, I raised up some of your sons for prophets and your young men for

1:26.6

Nazarites, suggesting that the

1:28.4

Nazarite, like the prophet, is a person especially close to God. The reason he had to bring

1:34.6

a sin offering was that he was now returning to ordinary life. His sin lay in ceasing to be a

1:41.7

Nazarite. Rabbi Eliezer Hakapa and Shmuel held the opposite opinion.

1:48.1

For them, the sin lay in becoming a Nazirite in the first place, and thereby denying himself

1:53.5

some of the pleasures of the world God created and declared good.

1:58.1

Rabbi Eliezer added, from this we may infer that if one who denies himself the

2:03.0

enjoyment of wine is called a sinner, all the more so someone who denies himself the enjoyment of

2:09.0

other pleasures of life. Clearly the argument is not just textual, it's substantive. It's about

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.