Sabrina Aisenberg & The Peculiar Particulars of Passing Polygraphs While Pleading the Fifth

Cold Case Murder Mysteries

True Crime

3.8 • 1.6K Ratings

🗓️ 20 November 2017

⏱️ 65 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On the morning of November 24, 1997, parents Steve and Marlene Aisenberg called 911 to report their 5-month-old daughter, Sabrina, had been taken from her crib in the middle of the night. But the police didn't find any evidence of an intruder. So, what began as a kidnapping quickly became whispers of foul play, with the cops pointing the finger at the parents. 20 years later, we're still wondering what happened to Sabrina Aisenberg. Join host Ryan Kraus for a psychological exploration of the truth beneath the lies.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hey everybody welcome back to cold case murder mysteries. I'm your host
0:10.9	Ryan Krauss and this is episode 22 covering the mysterious
0:14.2	disappearance of Sabrina Eisenberg, a five-month-old baby who garnered national
0:18.9	attention when she reportedly vanished from her family's Valrico Florida home in the middle of the night on November 24th, 1997.
0:27.0	In the eyes of some, it was a tragic abduction where somebody stole an infant from her crib with the intention of raising her or at least selling
0:34.6	her to somebody else who would. For others however, specifically the police,
0:39.7	something more sinister had seemingly taken place.
0:42.8	They believed Sabrina's parents, Stephen Marlene Eisenberg,
0:46.5	murdered the child and disposed of the body before staging the incident as a kidnapping.
0:51.1	But 20 years later, we still have no answers. Obviously, it's an incredibly
0:56.4	intriguing case, but one that offers very little in the way of evidence. In those
1:00.9	situations, I like to examine both sides of the coin by way of a common theme and in this event that theme is going to be manipulation
1:08.8	Each party is going to try to manipulate the circumstances to redistribute notions of guilt.
1:14.7	We simply need to note the totality of manipulation initiated by either side to understand
1:19.8	the probability of guilt in this situation.
1:22.4	So we'll head down that path and see where it
1:24.4	takes us. But first I want to take a moment to give a shout to my newest
1:28.1	supporter on Patreon, Steve Kominsky, from the podcast Baked in Awake.
1:32.2	Steve's been a big supporter of the show and have Cominsky from the podcast Baked in Awake.
1:32.7	Steve's been a big supporter of the show
1:34.7	and I'm very thankful to have him along for the journey.
1:37.2	So thank you very much, Steve.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cold Case Murder Mysteries, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cold Case Murder Mysteries and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.