My reaction to the verdict is verdict is one of, I guess disbelief still bothers me.

Could I feel he's an innocent man in prison?

As far as I'm concerned or still somebody out there that killed two people.

You're getting away with it.

In 1992, men were murdered in the woods of Western Michigan.

There were no eyewitnesses and little physical evidence.

There were plenty of leads, but all of them seemed to lead to dead ends.

My only theory is two guys were killed out while they were deer hunting shot through the back

with no real motive or explanation that I'm a world.

The case went cold.

Then, ten years later in 2000, a new team of detectives began looking into the murders.

I'm talking about this case. We didn't get it wrong.

We did not get it wrong. It's there.

I actually was willing to say Jeff might have done this because the police were saying

we have this kind of evidence, we have this stuff that is suggestive.

And being what I am, had he committed the murder, fine, he should go to prison.

I didn't think I'd ever be found guilty, because I didn't do nothing.

But I know justice is wrong, and then once you get convicted, they do not want to release you

because it's a bad mark on him.

This Monday, October 26th, undisclosed returns with season five, the state versus Jeff Titus,

to tell the story of a near-perfect crime, the man who was convicted of it,

and how two sets of investigators came to two very different conclusions.

...