On this week's Bet the Process podcast, we get very political.

We have the economist Dan Rosenheck on, and we nerd, nerd, nerd out on political forecasting.

And then Rufus and I try to explain what First Principle's thinking is to Rufus.

And I'm probably just going to end up sending him a link because I don't think I did a particularly good job at it.

So with that, let's start the process.

Bet, bet, bet, bet, bet the process.

Bet the process.

Welcome to the podcast.

Bet the process.

It's not the typical cookie cutter nonsense.

If you came just for picks, you're in the wrong place front it's how with the narrative to make a strong case Instead of blindly assuming a team must be tanking we're looking for the edge of messy P body rankings

Crunching all the numbers in the simulator system that break down the data analytically driven

Media coverage of sports gambling is pathetic.

Welcome to another episode about the process podcast where Rufus and I are already arguing.

So that's good.

We're ready for a discussion.

Do you want, I mean, we just did the interview with Dan Rosenheck from the economist, from the econom economist and uh and uh it's

sister publication to cigar aficionata do you think we should do like a post analysis of that

as our thing and kind of just jump in because you know you asked me during the interview of i was okay

and i was like listening and there's a lot of interesting themes.

I don't think I'm like as nerdy out about like election forecasting.

But broadly speaking, I think election forecasting of the category brings out some very

...