4.7 • 4.3K Ratings
🗓️ 1 June 2009
⏱️ 66 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome to Econ Talk, part of the Library of Economics and Liberty. I'm your host Russ Roberts |
0:13.9 | of George Mason University and Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Our website is econtalk.org |
0:21.2 | where you can subscribe, find other episodes, comment on this podcast, and find links to |
0:26.5 | other information related to today's conversation. Our email address is mail at econtalk.org. We'd |
0:33.6 | love to hear from you. Today is May 18th and my guest is Richard Epstein, James Parker Hall, |
0:42.6 | Distinguished Service Professor of Law at the University of Chicago, and the Peter and |
0:47.9 | Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Richard, welcome back |
0:52.8 | to econtalk. It's always great to be with you Russ. Our topic for today is the rule of law |
0:58.1 | in the current situation. Talk about what the rule of law is, first of all, and why it's important, |
1:03.8 | and then talk about what's going on right now. There is a huge difference in conceptions that |
1:10.8 | are brought to this particular area. Some of them are relatively minimal and some of them turn |
1:14.8 | out to be much and more intensive, and let me start with the minimalist conception and then go up |
1:19.4 | to the stronger conception. The basic notion of the rule of law at its core is the notion that |
1:25.0 | there are no extraordinary processes and that everybody is going to be subject to the same kinds |
1:30.6 | of legal system sanctions and courts when they are dealing with offenses, so that essentially the |
1:36.5 | rule of law under these circumstances is a kind of a parallel provision. You cannot treat me |
1:42.8 | different from the way in which you treat anybody else, and the theory about the word rule |
1:47.8 | is that it's designed to capture the fact that it cannot be outhawked with respect to particular |
1:52.2 | individuals. Now this definition is one that nobody wants to deny, but nobody who's serious about |
1:58.2 | the subject thinks that it's going to be sufficient to deal with the basic problem, which is how it |
2:03.5 | is that you take a sovereign, who would otherwise be plenary in its power, and subject it into some |
2:09.0 | kinds of limitations, so it's to allow the citizens within the realm to prosper. So the second |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Library of Economics and Liberty, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Library of Economics and Liberty and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.