The nine justices of the Supreme Court considered more than 60 cases this term

before rendering their final decisions earlier this week. Their rulings on

abortion access, presidential immunity, and the limits of federal agencies could have long lasting impacts.

They also showcased sharp divides among the justices.

I sat down with two Supreme Court watchers to reflect on this historic term.

Steve Laddick is a professor at Georgetown University's law center and Joan Biscupik

is CNN's senior Supreme Court analyst and author of the book Nine Black Robes.

Welcome to you, Bill.

Thanks for being here.

Joan, start us off here and let's begin with what was easily the court's most anticipated

decision on Monday deciding the court's most anticipated decision on Monday deciding the

presidents are entitled to some immunity from prosecution. How

consequential is that decision given how it could reshape the presidency?

Consequential for this year, but consequential for many, many years.

This was such a robust reading of executive power.

It was a very bold statement by robust reading of executive power.

It was a very bold statement by this court,

the 6-3 supermajority conservative court.

So I think it gave us a new insight

into the court under John Roberts and in terms of going forward

it's certainly already affecting prosecutions against former President Donald Trump

and will affect presidential powers and authority down the road.

...