meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Book Review

Rethinking the 'Tangled Tree' of Life

The Book Review

The New York Times

Arts, Books

4.23.7K Ratings

🗓️ 17 August 2018

⏱️ 62 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

David Quammen discusses his new book about the science of evolution, and Andrea Gabor talks about “After the Education Wars.”

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What if the Tree of Life isn't a tree? David Kwaman will be here to talk about his new book,

0:11.4

The Tangled Tree, a radical new history of life. Should a public school be run like a business?

0:17.6

Andrea Gabor will be here to talk about after the education wars. Plus, we'll talk about what we

0:22.9

and the wider world are reading. This is the Book Review Podcast from the New York Times. I'm Pamela

0:27.9

Paul. David Kwaman joins us now from his home office in Bozeman, Montana. His new book is called

0:44.4

The Tangled Tree, a radical new history of life. David, thanks so much for being here.

0:49.8

Pamela, great pleasure to talk with you. So let's start with the title. What is the Tangled Tree

0:55.2

or what was the tree before it got tangled? The untangled tree was the conventional tree of life.

1:01.8

The tree of life is a trope, an image that goes back deep in time, back to the book of Revelation,

1:08.8

where it was sort of a religious symbol. But beginning with Darwin, it was the image of the evolutionary

1:16.1

history of life on earth. Darwin himself suggested the tree as the graphic image of the way life has

1:24.0

arisen from a single origin, diverged, diversified, changed over time, dissent with modification,

1:32.5

branched apart, and resulted in the diversity of life on earth as we see it, the diversity being all,

1:40.8

the twigs and the branches and the canopy of the tree. That idea began as a very controversial one.

1:47.5

It's no longer at least among most people a controversy at all. And yet what you're saying in

1:54.7

this book is that it's also not quite accurate. Right. The tree of life is the history of evolution

2:02.3

is only controversial now in the sense that it's a rear guard orthodoxy. And beginning in the work

2:10.2

of my central character, Karl Wows, in the 1970s, but particularly in the 1990s, early 2000s, scientists

2:18.1

made some boggling discoveries that revealed to them among other things that the tree of life is not a

2:24.4

tree. It is a tangled, contorted, web-like, net-like intermingling of events, crossovers, and convergence,

2:34.6

divergence of lineages. The bush of life doesn't have the same rain.

2:39.3

The bush of life doesn't get it either because limbs on a bush don't converge. In the wild,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New York Times, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The New York Times and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.