meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Breakpoint

Rethinking Josephus and His Claims about Jesus

Breakpoint

Colson Center

Christianity, News Commentary, News, Religion & Spirituality

4.83.1K Ratings

🗓️ 27 January 2026

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

New book affirms Christ from a non-believing Jewish scholar's own words. 

__________

For more resources to live like a Christian in this cultural moment, go to breakpoint.org.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Breakpoint, a daily look, and an ever-changing culture through the lens of unchanging truth.

0:05.5

For the Colson Center, I'm John Stone Street.

0:09.3

Well, AI may have just solved an ancient puzzle.

0:11.7

For his new book, Josephus and Jesus, new evidence for the one called Christ, Dr. T.C. Schmidt used AI, among other methods, to test something that's long been in dispute.

0:22.9

What the first century historian actually said.

0:26.1

Flavius Josephus was also a Jewish scholar, priest, and military leader whose work has provided

0:31.3

essential understanding into Jewish life, both during his time and before.

0:36.5

He personally knew figures who appear in the Bible, like King Agrippa, which is mentioned in Acts 26,

0:42.2

and while he wrote about many of them, including John the Baptist and James the Brother of

0:46.7

Jesus, his most famous and controversial passage was about Christ himself.

0:51.9

Though the section on Jesus runs less than 100 words, it describes how he

0:55.7

was viewed by Jews while the apostles still lived. Josepha said that Jesus was a wise man,

1:01.4

who performed amazing acts, taught people looking for truth, gained many followers, was accused by

1:06.4

the leadership, executed by Pilate, and after three days appeared to his disciples. He also called

1:12.5

him the Christ and wondered if Jesus should be called a man. Making these claims even more remarkable

1:17.5

is that Josephus was plainly not a Christian himself and had no reason to exaggerate. Now,

1:22.9

two Christians, these claims are almost too good to be true, and that's the problem. Such a strong corroboration

1:29.0

of Christian doctrine from such an unlikely source has led most scholars, even most conservative ones,

1:35.3

to assume that at least these sections of Joseph's writings are a partial or total forgery.

1:41.6

Whatever he might have written, someone else probably added that pro-Christian

1:45.7

stuff. That assumption is what Schmidt's book undermines. Among other methods, Schmidt used AI to

1:52.5

analyze the language of Josephus, relying on an official Greek language thesaurus to conduct

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Colson Center, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Colson Center and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.