4.8 • 2.4K Ratings
🗓️ 28 June 2024
⏱️ 19 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hey everybody. It's James Lindsey. You're listening to new discourse's bullets where I give a bullet |
0:15.8 | point like summary of one topic, single topic from woke Marxism that we need to understand |
0:20.2 | so that we can defeat it. And what we need to understand is the George Soros dialectical method. |
0:25.8 | Now I've used a big word already dialectical. |
0:28.0 | And there have been some episodes already talking about the dialectic. |
0:30.7 | The dialectic is a means of marrying a truth to a lie for politically operational purposes. |
0:36.0 | That's a very simple way to define it. |
0:38.2 | We could get into all the hairy details where it's that there's a thing and it's a concept and its opposite is found within it and that's why things don't work out quite right and so then the thing and its opposite have to be kind of reckoned as part of the same dynamic system so that they can be understood from a higher |
0:53.9 | perspective that's called the synthesis or whatever you want and that's the kind of |
0:58.0 | more formal idea of dialectics so what you're going to do is therefore put in |
1:01.7 | conflict something and its opposite to try to put them on the same footing and understand them as part of the same dynamic whole. |
1:08.0 | In other words, so you can befuttle yourself. |
1:10.0 | But in practice, the dialectical methods are methods of marrying truths and lies of |
1:16.4 | taking that which is not and mixing it with what is so that it's palatable and putting out something that's basically a bit of |
1:26.0 | blended lie in truth. In other words, a distortion. And so the George Soros dialectical |
1:31.5 | method that he outlines in his famous book from 1992, which I did a very long-form podcast about that I encourage you to listen to. |
1:38.2 | This is a short summary of that longer podcast for easier briefer listening is called |
1:44.3 | reflexivity. He says that you can kind of separate the sciences into two categories, |
1:50.4 | the physical sciences or the hard sciences follow the |
1:54.3 | Paparian model that's Carl Popper's model of falsifiability, |
1:59.6 | universality and so on and they describe what appear to be objective facts. |
2:03.2 | He says alchemy has no purchase and in fact the science the March of the hard |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New Discourses, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of New Discourses and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.