Re-Sorting the Shelves: A Look at Bias In the Dewey Decimal System

On the Media

WNYC Studios

Magazine, Newspapers, Media, 1st, Advertising, Social Sciences, Studios, Radio, Transparency, Tv, History, Science, News Commentary, Npr, Technology, Amendment, Newspaper, Wnyc, News, Journalism

4.6 • 8.7K Ratings

🗓️ 9 November 2022

⏱️ 20 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Jess deCourcy Hinds is the solo librarian at the Bard High School, Early College library in Queens, New York. In 2010, she received a new order of books about the civil rights movement, but Hinds noticed something strange: all of the books had Dewey Decimal numbers in the 300s, meaning they were supposed to be shelved in the social sciences section. She thought that some of the books belonged in the 900s, the history section. Like books on President Obama. Because texts about the 44th President were classified as social science, he would be separated from all the other books about U.S. presidents in her library. It seemed like part of a trend. "When it came to the LGBTQ books, and the women's history books, and books on immigrant history, all of those were in the 300s as well," says Hinds. So she and her students decided to rebel, to put books about President Obama into the history section: "we just started moving them."

The Dewey Decimal Classification System is a method that dates back to 1876 and is used by most libraries around the world. The second most popular system, the Library of Congress Classification System, was published in the early 1900s and based on the organization of Thomas Jefferson's personal library. These systems help patrons find books on the shelves and facilitate resource-sharing between libraries. But they also encode bias into the structure of libraries. To understand what that means for our current collections, On the Media producer Molly Schwartz spoke with Wayne A. Wiegand, a library historian and author of Irrepressible Reformer: A Biography of Melvil Dewey, Caroline Saccucci, former Dewey Program Manager at the Library of Congress, Emily Drabinski interim chief librarian of the Mina Rees Library at CUNY, and Dartmouth librarian Jill Baron from the documentary Change the Subject.

This segment originally aired in our September 3, 2021 program, Organizing Chaos.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	Hello, Michael O'Inger. Welcome to the top of the show. Thanks for having me, Brooke Gladstone.
0:05.0	Do you know why we're here? I do, yes. I'm here to ask you a bunch of important questions
0:10.9	and I want you to respond honestly. As I always do. Okay, why are we here? We're here because
0:19.0	it's that time of year when we have to ask our listeners, I'm sorry, my cat, one second.
0:25.5	We're here to once again ask our listeners to consider financially supporting on the media.
0:35.5	Why? Because there are many people behind the scenes researching, coming up with ideas,
0:42.4	editing things really, really fast, doing all the smart media analysis stuff and that is hard
0:48.4	work that costs money. Why should they care? Our listeners? Because I think we do a good job.
0:54.6	I mean, think about the midterms, for instance, if the 2020 presidential election is any indication,
0:59.7	our media ecosystem is going to be inundated in false information, disinformation,
1:07.6	journalism is time and resource intensive because anyone can just spout their opinion,
1:15.0	do punditry, spread lies, but doing the kind of analysis that we do, doing the deep reporting
1:23.0	that we do is really hard. Okay, now you ask me and let's see how it goes. Okay. Hey,
1:30.9	Brooke, welcome to on the media, your own show. Oh, thank you very much, Michael Lohanscher.
1:35.5	I love being on your show. Brooke, do you know why we're here? Yes, I do. It is fundraising time
1:42.6	and people are going to be important by us to give us some money so that we can continue to do the
1:49.0	job we do. And why are we asking for money? Because we rely on the public. It's the most
1:55.3	consistent form of support is everybody knows. And because it's also a uniquely cool way of
2:02.3	funding journalism, we are not persuadable by any large single funding source. It's a lot,
2:10.0	a lot of, a lot of individual people that enable us to maintain our independence and to provide
2:16.3	what is a unique service on the media is a show like no other, wouldn't you say? I agree,
2:23.2	but I'd like to know why you think our show is unique and why you think our show needs this membership
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.