meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Rationally Speaking Podcast

Rationally Speaking #84 - Stephen Asma On the Myth of Universal Love

Rationally Speaking Podcast

New York City Skeptics

Society & Culture, Skepticism, Science, Philosophy

4.6787 Ratings

🗓️ 7 April 2013

⏱️ 46 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Just like love, motherhood, and apple pie, no one could be against fairness. No one, that is, except philosopher Stephen Asma, the author of "Against Fairness." Massimo and Julia sit down with Stephen in this episode of Rationally Speaking, to talk about what he thinks is wrong with the concept of fairness -- and about certain traditional values he thinks are more important.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Rationally speaking is a presentation of New York City skeptics dedicated to promoting critical thinking, skeptical inquiry, and science education.

0:22.4

For more information, please visit us at NYC Skeptics.org.

0:35.3

Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense.

0:40.5

I'm your host, Massimo Pilucci, and with me as always is my co-host, Julia Galev.

0:44.9

Julia, what are we going to talk about today?

0:47.6

Massimo, today we've got a great guest joining us remotely.

0:51.2

Stephen Asma is a professor of philosophy at Columbia College in Chicago and a fellow

0:57.2

there at the research group in mind, science, and culture. He's published a bunch of books now

1:02.4

about philosophy and culture and Buddhism. And his most recent book, which we're going to talk about

1:08.0

today, is called Against Fairness in Favor of Favoritism. Intriguing title. Welcome, Stephen. Oh, thanks for having me. So, Stephen,

1:17.6

what is it about fairness? It seems like fairness these days is something that nobody questions,

1:22.4

at least not in philosophy. I shouldn't say nobody. What are you against motherhood and apple pie

1:26.1

too? Puppies?

1:27.5

Want to kick some puppies?

1:29.7

Yeah, that's what I think the editor was worried that this was like the most unbuyable book ever.

1:36.3

But I think there are some real critiques of fairness, but they're sort of under the veneer of politeness. And sort of our

1:46.1

picture of ourself is always, you know, the most positive and ethically upright. But I think

1:51.6

there's a lot of problems with fairness. Perhaps most obviously the word is used to mean almost

1:59.5

anything and everything. And while I'm against fairness,

2:03.5

in terms of its sort of conceptual incoherence, I'm very much for justice. And it's interesting,

2:10.2

some people have sort of read me as being just against all ethics. And I must just be like a Nazi

2:15.9

in disguise or something.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from New York City Skeptics, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of New York City Skeptics and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.