Rashid Khalidi on the Palestinian Cause in a Volatile Middle East, and the Meaning of Settler Colonialism

The Political Scene | The New Yorker

WNYC Studios and The New Yorker

Politics, Obama, News, Wnyc, Washington, Barack, President, Lizza, Wickenden

4.2 • 3.3K Ratings

🗓️ 16 December 2024

⏱️ 53 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Power dynamics in the Middle East shifted dramatically this year. In Lebanon, Israel dealt a severe blow toHezbollah, and another crucial ally of Iran—Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria—was toppled by insurgents. But the historian Rashid Khalidi is skeptical that these changes will set back the Palestinian cause, as it relates to Israel. “This idea that the Palestinians are bereft of allies assumes that they had people who were doing things for their interest,” Khalidi tells David Remnick, “which I don’t think was true.” The limited responses to the war in Gaza by Iran and Hezbollah, Khalidi believes, clearly demonstrate that Iran’s so-called Axis of Resistance “was designed by Iran to protect the Iranian regime. . . . It wasn’t designed to protect Palestine.” Khalidi, a professor emeritus at Columbia University, is the author of a number of books on Palestinian history; among them, “The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine” has been particularly influential. The book helped bring the term “settler colonialism” into common parlance, at least on the left, to describe Israel’s relationship to historic Palestine. Sometimes invoked as a term of opprobrium, “settler colonialism” is strongly disputed by supporters of Israel. Khalidi asserts that the description is historically specific and accurate. The early Zionists, he says, understood their effort as colonization. “That’s not some antisemitic slur,” he says. “That’s the description they gave themselves.”
The concept of settler colonialism has been applied, on the political left, to describe Israel’s founding, and to its settlement of the Palestinian-occupied territories. This usage has been disputed by supporters of Israel and by thinkers including Adam Kirsch, an editor at the Wall Street Journal, who has also written about philosophy for The New Yorker. “Settler colonialism is . . . a zero-sum way of looking at the conflict,” Kirsch tells David Remnick. “In the classic examples, it involves the destruction of one people by another and their replacement over a large territory, really a continent-wide territory. That’s not at all the history of Israel and Palestine.” Kirsch made his case in a recent book, “On Settler Colonialism: Ideology, Violence, and Justice.”

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	You're listening to the political scene.
0:07.5	I'm David Remnick.
0:09.4	Early each week, we bring you a conversation from our episode of The New Yorker Radio
0:13.7	Hour.
0:18.9	The situation in the Middle East remains beyond complicated.
0:22.2	It's volatile and it's deadly.
0:24.8	The fall of Assad's regime in Syria removes a brutal tyrant from the region
0:28.9	and also removes one of Iran's key allies.
0:32.2	Israel greatly damaged another Iran ally, Hezbollah, and Lebanon,
0:36.2	before they agreed to a ceasefire.
0:38.8	How these developments will affect the war in Gaza is impossible to predict.
0:43.9	But today I'm going to talk to two people who have thought very deeply about the conflict
0:48.4	and the way it resonates around the world.
0:51.1	Later this hour, I'll speak with Adam Kersh of the Wall Street Journal.
0:55.4	But first, I'm joined by Rashid Khalidi, a professor of Middle Eastern and Arab Studies, and to my mind,
1:01.0	the best historian of Palestinian history in English. Recently, President Biden was seen
1:06.6	coming out of a bookstore in Nantucket, carrying Khalidie's 20-book, The Hundred Years' War on Palestine,
1:13.2	to which Khalidhi remarked, it's four years too late.
1:19.8	So let's start from not the beginning of things.
1:22.7	Obviously, this is a story that's been going on and on and on.
1:27.1	But how do you go about writing a history of this period?
1:32.3	Would you even attempt it?
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and The New Yorker and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.