Bill, we have questions from all over the world, and we want to ask you to respond to some

of these.

This from Thomas in the United States, Dr. Craig, would you please answer this question?

Or are you or are you not a theistic evolutionist?

Yes or no would suffice.

Greg Cocoa will ask you this question, and I did not believe your answer was clearly

stated.

He said essentially that eroding your search for the historic atom was one way things could

have occurred, but does not necessarily reflect what you believe.

If I misinterpreted, please clarify this for me.

Thank you, Thomas.

All right, Thomas wants to say yes or no answer, so I will say no.

My position is that I am agnostic about theistic evolution, depending on how you define it,

which Thomas unfortunately didn't do.

But I remain open-minded, I am willing to follow the evidence where it leads.

What I have said is that I don't think that theistic evolution is in any way incompatible

with the Bible.

So any reservations that I would have about theistic evolution would be not theological,

they would be scientific that in some way the theory is scientifically deficient.

So the answer is no, I remain agnostic.

An anonymous question came in, Bill, he says, if logos Christology is wrong, how should

we understand Jesus as the logos in John 1?

...