Dear Dr. Craig, I have read a lot of texts on your website and as far as I'm able to follow your answers.

I mean the more difficult philosophical,

logical explanations, I have found a lot of useful advice in order to enable me to give answers.

One of the questions that often arise are those that deal with Jesus' divinity. I know most of the places in the New Testament where

Jesus refers to his status as Son of God, but I'm always confused when I read that some scholars

maintain that he never claimed to be God. Now I found an article in Wikipedia, which also mentions

a kind of criticism from your part,

which really makes me uneasy because I thought that you defended Jesus' deity.

Here's the quotation.

Craig gives several other logically possible alternatives.

Jesus' claims as to his divinity were merely good faith mistakes resulting from his sincere efforts at reasoning.

Jesus was deluded with respect to the specific issue of his own divinity, while his faculties of moral

reasoning remained intact, or Jesus did not understand the claims he made about himself as amounting to a claim to divinity.

Please help me to disentangle my confusion, Margaret, Germany.

Wow, this just goes to underscore the point that you can't blindly trust Wikipedia,

but must always verify what it says.

I guarantee you that I never said anything like the quotation that is attributed to me.

Check out the source.

I'm inferring here that the context is something like the famous liar, lunatic, or lord

trilemma for explaining Jesus' radical personal claims. By showing that Jesus was not plausibly a liar

or a lunatic, one can show that he was who he claimed to be, namely the Lord. I've criticized the

traditional trilemma for its incompleteness. We need to add and then exclude a fourth alternative,

...