meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Up and Vanished

Q&A with Payne Lindsey and Philip Holloway 03.30.17

Up and Vanished

Tenderfoot TV

True Crime, Documentary, Society & Culture, Personal Journals

4.463.3K Ratings

🗓️ 31 March 2017

⏱️ 47 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Payne Lindsey and Philip Holloway answer your questions from our Voicemail line and from social media. Have a question? Call us at 770-545-6411. To learn more about listener data and our privacy practices visit: https://www.audacyinc.com/privacy-policy Learn more about your ad choices. Visit https://podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What if comparing car insurance rates was as easy as putting on your favorite podcast?

0:04.4

With Progressive, it is. Just visit the Progressive website to quote with all the

0:08.8

coverage as you want. You'll see Progressive's direct rate, then their tool will provide

0:12.7

options from other companies so you can compare. All you need to do is choose the rate and coverage

0:17.6

you like. QuoteToday at Progressive.com to join the over 29 million drivers who trust progressive.

0:23.6

Progressive casualty insurance company and affiliates comparison rates not available in all

0:27.3

states or situations. Price is very based on how you buy.

0:38.4

Hi this is Matt from Chicago. I have a quick leave of questions. I'm trying to follow up on a

0:44.2

question I heard on last week's episode and that was how can they connect on confession

0:49.0

along without any type of evidence to back up the confession. My question is what if there

0:55.1

is some evidence slightly cooperating evidence. Say the go up, for example, if I

1:00.4

answered DNA on this club, but it turns out that the chain of custody on that club wouldn't make

1:07.4

that evidence in admissible. Does that mean that then that confession would also not be admissible

1:13.3

without the proper evidence to go along with that? Okay so he brings up a good point about chain

1:18.8

of custody which refers to how an item is collected from a crime scene or any other place and how

1:24.8

it's maintained in terms of its integrity all the way through the process so that we know that

1:30.0

the item that's in court is the actual item that was collected and tested.

1:34.8

In Georgia, chain of custody is important but you don't have to show an entirely complete chain

1:41.2

of custody. There can be breaks in the chain of custody and it still be admissible. I'm not

1:46.4

suggesting that there are any breaks in the chain in this case because we just don't know.

1:50.8

But if there's a little bit of a break, it can still be admissible and the judge would instruct

1:56.5

the jury that that would go to the weight that they give any evidence. It's not its admissibility

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tenderfoot TV, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Tenderfoot TV and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.