You're not going to. You're going to do. Well, Greetings, welcome to the dividing line just as we were coming on the air.

It seems that Leighton Flowers is very busy today at the computer.

He's just madly typing away on

on the stuff he all types away on and it just posted well actually this is weird I just

look back over at it this is 22 hours ago and it just popped up. I do not

understand the algorithms as to what they think you're supposed to be looking at.

Anyways it's just popped up on my screen, literally. It wasn't there, then I looked over, and it's there. And someone had posted, and man, the next one possible to read,

Reformed doxology had posted,

uh, Gee has died for his people,

Gee has died for his friends,

Gee is died for his sheep, gee has died for his bride,

gee is dying for his own is one of the hardest biblical realities of

swallowing the scriptures yes truth gave references and of course you know the

debate coming up on that subject and Leighton writes GiesSI for Paul, Galatius II-20, therefore he didn't die for anyone else but Paul.

See how the negative inference fallacy works.

Well, that's what Leighton has been taught to do by David Allen. But no one, again, if Leighton had ever actually been reformed, he would understand these things, but obviously clearly he never was.

He would understand that when you point to Paul's statement, Christ I died with Christ, Christ I was me.

There's an entire theology there.

There is a theology of union with Christ.

There's a theology of the intercessory work of Christ for those who are in him.

There's this whole thing that if you take that perspective will lead you inevitably to universalism. You have to end up there.

Penal substitution is a reformed doctrine. There is no reason if you're not reformed to hold

...