meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The John Batchelor Show

#PREVIEW: What to make of Lukashenko, Putin and tactical nukes deployed on Poland/s and NATO's frontier? Peter Huessy Hudson Institute

The John Batchelor Show

John Batchelor

Society & Culture, Arts, News, Books

4.52.8K Ratings

🗓️ 22 June 2023

⏱️ 3 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Photo: No known restrictions on publication.
@Batchelorshow
1908 Barcelona

#PREVIEW: What to make of Lukashenko, Putin and tactical nukes deployed on Poland/s and NATO's frontier? Peter Huessy Hudson Institute

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is John Bachelor, speaking with my colleague, Peter Hussi of the Hudson Institute,

0:05.1

about the intention, says the Kremlin, to deploy tactical nuclear weapons to Belarus and the

0:12.0

dictator Lukashenko. The answer is complicated on the basis of previous history of the Russian

0:19.0

Federation under Boris Yeltsin and tactical nuclear weapons and their use on the battlefield

0:25.6

from Russia's point of view. Here's Peter. This is all part of a using nuclear weapons for coercion

0:33.7

and blackmail, create high uncertainty in the West, engage in totally reckless rhetoric. If you

0:39.8

see this one from Putin for a year and a half, in the hopes that the United States and its allies

0:45.0

stand down, the issue here is uncertainty breeds miscalculation and miscalculation can be an

0:53.9

opposite. If this is an opposite with nuclear weapons, we're in a total different kettle of fish

0:59.1

John than we would be if it was. Remember the missile that went from Ukraine over Poland and it was

1:05.2

worried whether it was an Russian missile or a Ukraine missile. This is why this is so dangerous

1:12.0

and it's uncertain where Mr. Putin is going with this, but if you go back to 1999, when Yeltsin says,

1:19.5

give me battlefield nuclear weapons. I can use in a conflict on the battlefield to push the other

1:25.9

guys to stop fighting and to stand down so we can win conventionally and we don't have to go

1:33.1

nuclear because they were worried about their capability conventionally to stand up to what they

1:38.0

saw in the United States as it stormed and then you saw the break take down the Taliban and the

1:43.0

take down a Saddam under the Bush administration. So John, that's where this is all coming from

1:48.1

and the question is how reckless do you think they are and how much of it do we think is a bluff

1:54.1

and otherwise administration has said we say no movement of Russian nukes we don't see any reason

1:59.7

to change our posture. A number of the officials have said, if even of attack with nuclear weapons,

2:07.5

we will respond with better conventional weapons, but that's down the road. So the question is,

2:15.2

we're very basically behind eight ball when it comes to nuclear weapons in Europe. We have gravity

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.