meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The John Batchelor Show

#PREVIEW: #NUKES: #UK: Excerpt from a conversation with colleague Gregory Copley re the report in London that the Biden Administration is deploying tactical nuclear weapons -- likey gravity bombs to be droped by manned aircrat such as the F-35 --to the RA

The John Batchelor Show

John Batchelor

Society & Culture, Arts, News, Books

4.52.8K Ratings

🗓️ 30 January 2024

⏱️ 3 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

#PREVIEW: #NUKES: #UK: Excerpt from a conversation with colleague Gregory Copley re the report in London that the Biden Administration is deploying tactical nuclear weapons -- likey gravity bombs to be droped by manned aircrat such as the F-35 --to the RAF Lakenheath base in Suffolk. And why? And to what intention? More tonight.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/plans-progress-to-bring-us-nuclear-weapons-to-uk/ar-BB1hqDrv

1945 Hiroshima burn victims

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is John Batcher, a conversation with my friend and colleague Gregory Coppley in Western

0:04.8

Australia about the news out of London that the US is deploying technical nuclear weapons

0:11.8

to UK, the first airbase in Suffolk. And the reason for this

0:18.9

deployment Gregory comments is to match the deployment of weapons in Belarus or perhaps in Kaliningrad, the ex-glave

0:29.6

on the Baltic Sea. The puzzle here is what do you use the nuclear weapon for?

0:35.0

Gregory observes the extreme impracticality of a tactical nuclear weapon in a world today.

0:42.0

However, here's Gregory nukes to the UK just like the Cold War,

0:47.7

just like the old days, back to the future. Well the nuclear escalation we've been seeing over the last two years has been an

0:56.0

escalation of words and these are you know if you like Wolf warrior diplomacy Russian style wolf warrior diplomacy

1:05.0

Washington style yes the US could well be re-introducing tactical or theater nuclear weapons into Lake and Heath where they have been

1:18.7

used or deployed for decades during the Cold War. This is where we had US Air Force F-111's taking

1:27.6

off to attack Libya, for example, with conventional weapons at the time, that's that was basically the area

1:35.0

where the US would deploy its nuclear forces before they went even further

1:39.6

forward to either Germany or for example to Cyprus but the British of course have their own nuclear arsenal of not

1:46.0

only tactical nuclear weapons but strategic nuclear weapons airborne,

1:50.7

submarine-born and the like. So the symbolism of the US doing this is literally just

1:58.0

that. The question is what would you use nuclear weapons for even tactical ones if you don't have a demonstrable

2:07.2

threat from for example a large armored formation or the like because nuclear weapons are just big bombs and you need to have suitable

2:14.8

targets for them. They're not war-winning weapons in themselves. So yes it's significant

2:21.9

but it's part of the escalatory rhetoric and I think

2:26.6

Washington at this particular point in an election year is looking to appear

2:31.6

strong to its domestic audience as well as to its NATO allies

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.