meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
I Don't Speak German

PREVIEW: Backer Bonus Episode on 'Slaughterhouse Five' by Kurt Vonnegut

I Don't Speak German

IDSG

Politics, News, Currentaffairs, Society & Culture

3.91.1K Ratings

🗓️ 19 July 2022

⏱️ 5 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Become a backer of Daniel or Jack to get exclusive access to a new bonus episode.

Becoming a patron also brings access to all other bonus episodes. At least one new Patreon exclusive bonus episode every month.

This time we talk about Slaughterhouse Five, Kurt Vonnegut's classic satire of war and American civilisation (but I repeat myself), and the disappointing movie version.

Slaughterhouse-Five - Wikipedia

Daniel's Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/danielharper/posts

Jack's Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=4196618&fan_landing=true

Please consider donating to help us make the show and stay independent. Patrons get exclusive access to one full extra episode a month.

IDSG Twitter: https://twitter.com/idsgpod

Daniel's Twitter: @danieleharper

Jack's Twitter: @_Jack_Graham_

IDSG on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/i-dont-speak-german/id1449848509?ls=1

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

IDSG bonus episodes are a regular extra just for Patreon backers of myself or Daniel. Here's a

0:06.4

preview of the new one. The book goes out of its way to remind you of the Holocaust on several

0:12.5

occasions. It mentions that the POW camp where he's initially unloaded was originally built to

0:18.4

be an extermination camp. The British prisoners of war that they're originally billeted were

0:23.7

they're using candles and things like that that are made out of human fat. I don't know if that's

0:28.2

historically accurate. It was believed to be. It was believed to be at the time he wrote his

0:35.6

novel. It was believed to be and on that subject, the book actually mentions by name David Erby

0:42.5

as a historian of the bombing of Dresden and it repeats his numbers for the dead of Dresden

0:49.6

which leads the narrator to actually categorically state at one point. I think it's actually in

0:56.7

the first chapter so it's Vonnegut talking as himself that he witnessed the the biggest massacre

1:02.6

on European soil which he's getting from David Irving's figures about Dresden which we now know

1:08.2

to be at the time David Irving was considered a respectable historian and that book was considered

1:12.9

a serious piece of historiography. It was criticized and it was debated but it wasn't it's not like now

1:18.4

where we I mean this is a genuine sort of of its time thing for once. It's a genuine thing. At

1:23.3

the time there were criticisms but people did not know at the time that David Irving was actually

1:28.1

a Nazi and a falsifier of history and a Holocaust. The historiography is now revised on that subject

1:35.6

and David Irving is no longer taken seriously. So I don't think Vonnegut has anything to apologize

1:41.7

anything much to apologize for there except relying on data which has subsequently been

1:47.8

called into question but that does yeah I mean your point was about the the possible perception

1:56.7

of moral equivalents and I think it's a question of it's a question of levels isn't it because I

2:04.8

think what he what the book is trying to get at is the idea that sort of on a on an interpersonal

2:10.4

level on a normal human level people are pretty much helpless in the situations that they find

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from IDSG, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of IDSG and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.