meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

PREMIUM-PEL Thick-of-Fall Nightcap 2024

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Casey, Paskin, Philosophy, Linsenmayer, Society & Culture, Alwan

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 17 November 2024

⏱️ 10 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Mark, Wes, and Seth talk about horror media and what scares us in light of Halloween. We then give some follow-up discussion re. our Williamson and Chappell interviews. Do we actually want to participate in Williamson's science-minded analytic philosophy of the future? Were we too one-sided in our trans coverage? We respond to an email about our trans episode.

If you're not hearing the full version of this discussion, sign up via one of the options described at partiallyexaminedlife.com/support.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

you're about to hear a preview of partially examined life supporter exclusive content

0:10.3

to learn how to get the whole thing check out partially examined life.com slash support

0:14.0

hey it's your partially examined life nightcap we We are recording this in mid-October.

0:22.2

Maybe for you, the election has passed.

0:24.5

I'm not sure exactly when this will go up.

0:26.7

Maybe for you, Halloween is over.

0:29.4

But we're right in the thick of it.

0:30.9

It's the season.

0:34.4

Well, speaking of sadomasochism, Williamson.

0:48.8

Obviously, Williamson is a first-rate philosophical genius, and we probably should have focused on his philosophy of philosophy book, which looks to be aimed at a regular audience.

0:53.7

But the one that we did read the chapters of, at least there were parts of it that we had a little trouble.

0:54.4

Let's put it that way. Just out of curiosity, who is the intended audience of that book? Because I can't think of

0:59.5

anybody who would, is it academics that only care about the very small little thing?

1:05.0

It's academics who are trying to open to the challenge of becoming the philosophers of the future

1:10.5

that he seems to want them to be.

1:13.0

And he got in a little bit about philosophers should be trained in modeling, like an actual

1:18.0

mathematical modeling. And I was trying to get at like, well, what would a mathematical model

1:22.2

be in ethics, for instance, since he's really clearly interested in ethical theories, not just descriptive,

1:28.4

but normative ones. And I couldn't really suss out to him what that involves. So I guess we just

1:33.2

have to read more of his... Maybe if we had read more of the book, we would have gotten something

1:36.4

concrete. But my hunch is that I don't think this old... It's ingenious, right? To say that

1:41.6

philosophical problems arise out of us taking heuristics too seriously, to me,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.