meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

PREMIUM-Ep. 256: Kropotkin's Anarchist Communism (Part Two)

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

Mark Linsenmayer

Casey, Paskin, Philosophy, Linsenmayer, Society & Culture, Alwan

4.62.3K Ratings

🗓️ 16 November 2020

⏱️ 8 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Mark, Wes, Dylan, Seth get into specific points and textual passages from Peter Kropotkin's The Conquest of Bread (1892).

In this preview, we start by considering that Kropotkin is right that mutual aid is a natural tendency and so communism is very much feasible, why hasn't it happened already? In the full discussion, we discuss K's version of the "you didn't build that" argument, plus guaranteed minimum income, identity and criminal justice in a stateless world, religion, and more.

To hear this second part, you'll need to go sign up at partiallyexaminedlife.com/support.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi, this is our preview of the partially examined life episode 256, part 2 on Peter Krapatkin's

0:12.8

The Conquest of Bread.

0:14.6

In this continuation of our previous discussion, we go way into more specific quotes from the

0:18.6

text, and here you are going to hear the first seven minutes of that discussion, starting

0:23.6

with the Preface of the Book.

0:25.9

This Preface written in 1913 that he added conveys one of the standard objections people

0:31.5

give to, if you want to say that mutual aid is just natural communism is sort of the natural

0:37.1

endpoint of the search for liberty.

0:39.7

Of course, we've been trying to get away from kings and other oligarchs to individual

0:45.3

rights, and that he thinks communism is just the natural endpoint of that.

0:49.1

People here might say, well, how come it's never worked that way?

0:52.8

How come whatever it's been tried, it's been a horrible messy dictatorship kind of thing.

0:58.4

Of course, this was written before.

1:00.5

Those things actually happened, but still he's asking, given that we've had thousands of

1:04.6

years of why have we not seen that?

1:06.8

And he wants to say, actually, we see evidence of that all over the place that you see all

1:11.7

sorts of these associations and individual small groups.

1:16.1

There's just this other countervailing force of authoritarianism that seems just people

1:21.6

rising up and taking over.

1:23.2

Did you find that convincing?

1:24.8

It's a little bit of a non-answer.

1:26.5

It's saying that, of course, we see evidence around it.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Mark Linsenmayer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Mark Linsenmayer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.