as I'm mature as an investor and I truly am starting to think like an investor not like a hustler, flipper,

entrepreneur, like just as a investor.

I've bought a bunch of AirB&Bs in Joshua Tree.

I bought in a bunch of single family houses in Southern California, San Bernardino,

Riverside County, Banning, all over the place.

I've bought properties in Las Vegas, single family, multi family.

Now I'm like, okay, maybe I need to go to the Midwest and start buying these not cheap I don't want to buy

15,000 homes even though that sounds sexy to people I don't want to do that but maybe

these like 75 to 150,000

homes that actually produce some cash flow and are not that old

what do you think about that?

I like that strategy a lot. I'm not a huge fan personally of the Midwest because

I'm South-Southwest focused but I've also considered that because I don't like I definitely agree with you I don't like the houses are like 30 40,000 dollars that are never going to go up or maybe you go up a little bit and there's a high crime rate and you know it can mess up with cash flow with just one thing going wrong with the property.

So I don't disagree with you on that at all because those are, especially the party you said that are somewhat newer built.

The rentals that I'm buying in Southern California in the Palmdale Land. said that are somewhat newer built. Yes.

The rentals that I'm buying in Southern California

in the Palmdale Lancaster, Analog Valley area,

my buying criteria is 1990s.

It's overbuilt, and 19,

built after 1990s, at least three bedrooms, two baths,

with a certain kind of square footage.

And those have done really well and they perform well for me

...