meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The New Statesman | UK politics and culture

Pfee-pfi-pfo-pfum, I Smell the Blood of Gavin Williamson

The New Statesman | UK politics and culture

The New Statesman

News & Politics, Society & Culture, News, Politics

4.41.4K Ratings

🗓️ 4 December 2020

⏱️ 26 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On today's New Statesman Podcast, Stephen Bush and Anoosh Chakelian discuss the vaccine roll-out and Gavin Williamson's controversial comments about Brexit's impact on Britain's regulatory abilities. Then, in You Ask Us, they answer your question on how substantial a scotch egg is.


If you are a New Statesman digital subscriber you can get advert free access to this podcast by visiting newstatesman.com/nssubscribers.


Send us your You Ask Us questions at youaskus.co.uk.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Attention at all passengers. You can now book your train tickets on Uber and get 10% back in Uber credits to spend on your next train journey.

0:11.0

So no excuses not to visit your in-laws this Christmas.

0:16.5

Trains now on Uber. T's and C's apply check the Uber app. On this episode of the New Statesman podcast we discuss the vaccine rollout and you

0:37.4

ask us does a Scotch egg count as a substantial meal. We're speaking in a week when the UK has been the first to approve the Pfizer vaccine,

0:51.0

so people in the UK are going to start being vaccinated next week. This has been

0:56.2

accompanied with quite a bit of sort of flag-waving rhetoric from ministers since the

1:01.0

news broke, basically showing off that our regulator managed to approve

1:05.4

it first and suggesting that this is somehow either a result of Brexit or because Britain is just

1:10.5

simply a better country, as Gavin Williamson put it. Stephen you got a number of

1:16.4

responses to your morning call about the vaccine didn't you and what does that

1:20.5

tell us about the way that ministers are framing the news?

1:24.0

Yeah, so yesterday, well, Wednesday if you are someone who has not kindly subscribed

1:29.2

and therefore gets on the day access. So on Wednesday, obviously the day of the press conference, I sent it after the press conference, you know, obviously I usually get replies mostly from a kind of cast of regulars or people who live in one of the countries mentioned in the

1:44.2

smalls or work in a relevant industry or you know the ones I enjoy less which is

1:48.7

people pointing out typos but yeah I got you know more than a hundred which okay is a teeny tiny fraction of the number of people who actually receive it

1:57.5

But it's well in excess of the number of emails I have ever got about a single topic before.

2:04.4

I mean, yeah, like us leaving that you didn't get that many replies.

2:07.8

Don Cummings didn't get that many replies from people who some had reasonable fears, some had fears than I would say were sort of like out and out

2:17.8

conspiracism, but actually even the ones which were out and out conspiracism.

2:21.4

So to take one which I specifically

2:23.2

decided I had to tackle in today's. So they got enough of them. I thought, okay, right,

2:26.7

I this is beyond my like logistical ability to like do a bespoke like, look, here's what I was

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New Statesman, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The New Statesman and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.