4.7 • 4.3K Ratings
🗓️ 10 December 2007
⏱️ 78 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome to Econ Talk, part of the Library of Economics and Liberty. I'm your host Russ Roberts |
0:13.9 | of George Mason University and Stanford University's Hoover Institution. Our website is econtalk.org |
0:21.2 | where you can subscribe, find other episodes, comment on this podcast, and find links to |
0:26.5 | another information related to today's conversation. Our email address is mailadicontalk.org. We'd |
0:33.6 | love to hear from you. My guest today is my colleague here in the Department of Economics at |
0:41.1 | George Mason University, Pete Betke. Pete, welcome back to Econ Talk. Welcome Russ, thanks. Our topic |
0:47.7 | for today is Austrian Economics, the Austrian School of Economics. My goal is to give you the |
0:52.9 | less darn overview of the Austrian School, and few are more qualified to do that than Pete. Pete |
0:57.8 | tells about the origins of the Austrian School. Well, the Austrian School started on the late 19th |
1:04.0 | century, as in a lot of cases in economics, the school label was given to them by their enemies, |
1:10.4 | not by their, not, they didn't self-identify themselves as Austrian economist Carl Manger wrote a |
1:16.4 | book he was working as a financial journalist, and he wanted to sort of understand how you could |
1:23.9 | explain prices and movements of prices. And he thought that the German language contributions to |
1:31.6 | economics had under emphasized the sort of universal theoretical ideas that are essential for being |
1:38.6 | able to interpret historical phenomena such as the movement of prices. And so he set out to write a |
1:44.8 | book explaining how it is that prices emerge on markets. And he dedicated, in fact, to the German |
1:51.6 | historical school because he thought that he was, in fact, contributing to the great tradition of |
1:56.5 | German language economics, which stood in somewhat juxtaposition to classical British economics, |
2:03.9 | but he was trying to bring a non-recordion. So the British economics had moved to a |
2:10.8 | Ricardian tradition in which tended to under emphasize the human element and instead focus on the |
2:17.2 | long-run cost side of things, technology and resource scarcity, not the perceptions of the human |
2:25.4 | agents. As Manger says in his book, man is the alpha and the omega of economics, and so he wanted |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Library of Economics and Liberty, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Library of Economics and Liberty and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.