meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

Paul Gigot Interviews Jason Riley on 'The Affirmative Action Myth'

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

The Wall Street Journal

Society & Culture, News

42.7K Ratings

🗓️ 5 May 2025

⏱️ 32 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Riley talks about his book in which he argues that black Americans made faster educational and economic progress before the onset of racial preferences and welfare programs. They also discuss whether it makes sense for colleges to give preferences to students from poor economic backgrounds.   Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Amazon offers employees up to £8,000 for education and training, like Juliet.

0:07.0

She's now a trained technician.

0:10.0

And to her, the sound of machinery in need of repair, reminds her of how far she's come.

0:18.0

In two years, she's landed her dream job, providing her with valuable skills. That's up to

0:24.8

£8,000 for education and training at Amazon. Eligibility conditions apply. From the opinion pages of the

0:34.5

Wall Street Journal, this is Potomac Watch. Welcome to Potomac Watch, the daily

0:41.6

podcast of the Wall Street Journal Opinion Department. I'm Paul as you go, the editor of WCA

0:47.4

Opinion. And today we have a special guest, special show, as we're going to talk to

0:53.3

Wall Street Journal columnist,

0:55.6

Jason Riley, about his new book. It's entitled The Affirmative Action Myth, Why Blacks Don't

1:01.4

Need Racial Preferences to Succeed from Basic Books. So welcome, Jason. Good to see you. How are you doing?

1:09.4

Good to see you, Paul. I'm doing well. Okay. Let's talk about the core argument of your book that will let you define it.

1:16.6

Sure. The core argument of the book is that blacks were progressing at a faster rate, both

1:22.6

educationally and economically in the decades leading up to affirmative action, which began in earnest in the 1970s.

1:31.3

Then they were in the era of affirmative action, which the Supreme Court, in a sense, finally brought to an end in its 2023 decision,

1:39.8

Students for Fair Admissions versus Harvard.

1:42.2

So the book is an attempt to sort of do a comparison of before and after trends among blacks.

1:48.7

And so that was the point in writing the book. And the lead up to that Supreme Court decision, which many people were expecting,

1:54.5

there was all of this doomsday discussion on the left in particular among elites that this would spell the end of the black middle class if we got rid of racial preferences.

2:05.6

And I wanted to push back on that narrative because the data does not show that affirmative action or racial preferences created the black middle class.

2:15.6

There was a black middle class in this country prior to

2:20.3

1970, and it was growing at a nice clip. And if anything, the growth of the black middle class has

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 26 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Wall Street Journal, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Wall Street Journal and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.