meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Philosophy Bites

Paul Boghossian on Moral Relativism

Philosophy Bites

Nigel Warburton

Education, Philosophy, Society & Culture

4.62K Ratings

🗓️ 23 October 2011

⏱️ 17 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Are moral judgements simply relative to culture? Are moral relativists in the grip of a fundamental confusion, or is that just the view of a philosophical subculture? Paul Boghossian suggests that moral relativism is an untenable position in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. Philosophy Bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is made in philosophy bites with me David Edmonds and me Nigel Warburton.

0:06.0

Philosophy bites is available at www

0:09.0

philosophy bites.com.

0:11.0

Philosophy bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy.

0:15.0

The following statement seems uncontroversial.

0:18.0

It's wrong to torture children.

0:20.0

It's not difficult to get people to sign up to such a proposition.

0:24.0

Yet, under the influence of various strains of postmodernism, many now also insist that morality

0:29.2

is relative.

0:31.0

And since morality is relative, such people often add, we should withhold criticism of those who don't share our values.

0:37.0

For example, we in the West may believe in various human rights, but that's just our value system.

0:42.0

It's not grounded in any form of

0:44.3

objectivity. Paul Bergosian is based at New York University.

0:49.0

Moll Relativist, he argues, are in the grip of a fundamental confusion.

0:54.0

Paul Bagozian, welcome to Flossi Bites.

0:57.0

Very good to be here.

0:58.0

We're focusing on moral relativism.

1:00.0

Could you just say what that is?

1:02.0

I'll try. I think people have had various different ideas by what they're going to mean by

1:07.6

relativism in general, more relativism in particular. I tend to think of it as people striving to occupy a position that is halfway between

1:16.5

moral absolutism on the one hand and moral nihilism or moral limitivism on the other,

1:22.6

where you drop all serious use of moral or normative vocabulary.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nigel Warburton, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Nigel Warburton and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.