Hey, Peter Navarro here with a bonus set of podcast based on an extended interview with

O'Reilly, Melber on MS-BC.

In part two of this bonus pack, Ari and I explore the question, the crucial questions related to executive privilege and the constitutional

separation of powers.

This issue is absolutely central to my case.

Look, let me know what you think at my sub stack at

W.W. dot Peter Navarro dot sub stack.com.

Here we go.

This quibble about what a formal invocation looks like it's going to be a big part of the

appeals process.

Look our view is first of all it's presumptive.

Second of all every other White other senior White House aide that ever got subpoenaed by that

that by the Pelosi Congress had privilege invoked. Some got letters, some didn't, but it was involved. Nobody ever got challenged.

This goes back to 2019.

I understand what you're saying, as you know and we talked about this, everyone else went in and

participated to invoke privilege.

That's like what Meadows did.

They tried to invoke it while participating.

You were convicted.

Again, this is not anyone's opinion here.

This was a interesting. Let me finish.

Peter, let me finish and I'll give it back to you.

...