as it is a controlled and managed process anywhere else in the world that the US has a hand in it.

So when they appoint the candidate whom they want to win, who they've decided to win, who the oligarchs have decided should win, they need

there to be some democratic plausibility to that win to make people think, either make people think that yes they did this

this candidate did in fact win or you make such a convincing and coercive and

manipulative narrative around that candidate that no one will

admit that they didn't vote for that candidate. In other words, she's going to be

the first woman president. Well wouldn't you be ashamed of yourself if you didn't vote to break the presidential glass ceiling?

She's a woman of color. Well, wouldn't you be ashamed to say that you didn't vote for a woman of color?

Well, that would make you a racist.

If you don't vote for her, then the only two reasons that could possibly be is because she's a woman and she is a woman of color.

So that means you're a misogynist and you're racist.

So you can craft a narrative around her that everyone will want to say that they voted for her even if they

didn't turn out to vote at all.

Because we're going to hear nothing for the next three months except how excited the Democrats

are, how reinvigorated they are, and how thrilled

and breathless with anticipation the American people are for being able to finally achieve this first woman presidency in the United States.

Everyone is excited about it.

So therefore, when she is appointed as the President, if that's what happens, when she is

appointed as the President, everyone can believe that the

hype got her elected, even if no one shows up at the voting booth.

And when everyone starts cheering in triumph and applauding and congratulating themselves

for being so progressive and so liberal as to elect the first woman president and the first

...