the author of Unum Sanctum. It is also evident that the jurisdiction of the spiritual power over the secular

has, for its basis, the concept of the church as guardian of the Christian law of morals. Hence, her

jurisdiction extends as far as this law is concerned. Consequently, when King Philip protested,

Clement V, was able, in his brief Mayru of February 1, 1306,

to declare that the French king in France were to suffer no disadvantage on account of the bull, Unum Sanctum,

and that the issuing of this bull had not made them subject to the authority of the Roman Church in any other manner than formerly.

In this way, Pope Clement V was able to give France and its ruler a guarantee of security

from the ecclesiastico political results of the opinions elaborated in the bull,

while its dogmatic decision suffered no detriment of any kind.

So basically, what Unum Sanctum said was that the secular order should take cues from the spiritual order. It says to be saved, you have to be

submitted to the Roman pontiff and also to the temporal authority and power the Roman pontiff.

So he didn't even read what Unum

Sanctum actually says. By the way, he didn't read what Francis actually says about the death

noise. So all of this is is basically Trent Spin. There's no actual sourcing of documents,

but who cares what the Clement, the Fifth thinks about the bull. That's not the point. The point is the

papal documents and what they say because they're binding. Not what Clement thinks. Who cares

what he thinks? And who cares that he's making the argument that, well, it was already kind of

believed anyway prior to the bull being stated.

Okay, but the bull actually says it is necessary for the salvation of every creature,

not only to be subject to the Roman pontiff in matters spiritual, but also in matters temporal.

That is the papacy violating the ancient canons,

setting itself up as a state power and authority.

...