4.8 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 29 October 2025
⏱️ 136 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is part two of our episode on stalking and harassment, something our family has been |
| 0:05.6 | enduring for months. If you haven't yet, we recommend going back and listening to part one first. |
| 0:10.8 | It provides important context for what you are about to hear. |
| 0:15.1 | On Wednesday, September 15th, 2025, I went live on YouTube for exactly nine hours and nine minutes. Yes, you heard that |
| 0:23.6 | right, nine hours and nine minutes. That live stream, which I never intended to do, was raw, |
| 0:31.2 | emotional, and deeply personal. It was my attempt to reclaim my voice after months of being |
| 0:36.6 | silenced, targeted, and misrepresented. |
| 0:39.2 | Over the past several months, I have become the focus of a relentless smear campaign and the victim of persistent stalking, both online and in person. |
| 0:48.8 | So out of concern for my safety and for the safety of my husband, John, and our child, I filed for a civil stalking |
| 0:55.4 | injunction and was granted a temporary stocking injunction. And then something unexpected happened. |
| 1:02.3 | It always does, right? And this unexpected something was that law and crime requested to |
| 1:08.7 | broadcast my evidentiary hearing where I hoped to make my temporary |
| 1:13.1 | stocking injunction permanent. This was a proceeding that would have exposed the most private |
| 1:18.4 | details of our lives, including those involving our young child and sensitive mental health |
| 1:23.2 | matters. And look, as a journalist, I understand the importance of transparency. I do. But I also know |
| 1:30.3 | that some hearings are not meant for public broadcast, child custody cases, for instance, or |
| 1:36.3 | civil stalking injunctions. And why? Because they carry real risks for victims. When such cases are |
| 1:43.4 | aired to the world, the victims themselves can become |
| 1:45.8 | targets all over again. Allowing law and crime to stream that hearing would have set a dangerous |
| 1:51.5 | precedent, one that could silence other survivors out of fear that seeking protection means surrendering |
| 1:57.4 | privacy forever. So I made the difficult choice. I withdrew my case. And instead of |
| 2:04.5 | letting strangers or law and crime narrate my story, I chose to bravely tell it myself. 24 hours after |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Hidden True Crime, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Hidden True Crime and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.