Ben and Nathan tackle Parallel Reasoning questions, a question type that some students prefer to skip. They assure listeners that these questions work just like any other LSAT question. Gimmicks—like reading the question first or diagramming—don’t help and only distract from the core task. Focus instead on reading for comprehension and understanding the argument. The key is to identify the reasoning and treat everything else as secondary.

⁠Study with our Free Plan⁠

⁠Download our iOS app⁠

⁠Watch Episode 514 on YouTube⁠

0:30 – How Cheating Spreads in Law School

Ben and Nathan discuss a Wall Street Journal article on extended-time accommodations at Pepperdine Law, where 30% of students reportedly receive them. They argue that accommodations should level the playing field, not give an advantage. They question the value of timed essay exams and compare law school to gaining entry into an ABA-approved guild, suggesting that gaming the system might seem rational, ethics aside.

LSAT Demon Scholarship Estimator

27:25 – WashU Law Pre-Application Trap

A listener is contacted for an interview by WashU Law before even applying. Ben and Nathan caution that this is a sales tactic: the school is trying to extract information and create perceived interest to reduce scholarship offers. They revisit their advice about the Candidate Referral Service, suggesting it might be time to reconsider what students share with schools early in the process.

36:12 – Parallel Reasoning Clarity

The guys break down Parallel Reasoning questions on the LSAT. They emphasize that matching language or subject matter is secondary—what matters is aligning the logical structure of arguments. To succeed, students must first understand the core argument before worrying about technical parallels. A big-picture approach is key.

53:20 – Tips from a Departing Demon

A departing Demon, Vox, shares his advice for other students: keep your study streak alive. Even a single question can turn into an hour of productive study. Consistency compounds.

54:56 – Zyns on the LSAT

Redditors wonder if nicotine pouches like Zyn are allowed during the LSAT. Ben and Nathan suggest that they aren’t explicitly banned, but advise playing it safe and contacting LSAC directly. Better to assume they’re off-limits.

1:03:22 – Why Are Others Wrong?

Listener Andrew is thinking about writing an LSAT addendum. Ben and Nathan advise him to focus on improving his score with his two remaining attempts. They argue that law school deans who encourage addenda are trying to get applicants to expose weaknesses. Schools are more interested in reporting the highest LSAT scores, driving denial numbers up, and collecting full tuition. Admissions advice is often self-serving.

1:18:21 – Personal Statement Gong Show

Danielle sends in their submission for the Personal Statement Gong Show, the show where Ben and Nathan read personal statements and hit the gong when something goes wrong. The standing record to beat is ten lines, held by Greta.

1:32:38 - What’s the Deal With… Jacksonville University? 

Ben and Nate take a look at Jacksonville University, the newest school to receive ABA accreditation. While there are reasons why this may be a good fit, you shouldn’t pay to be the school’s guinea pigs. 

Catch up on all of our What’s the Deal With… segments!

1:42:50 - Word of the Week - Legerdemain 

“Commenting on the county counsel exception, the court termed it a 'legerdemain giving birth to a solution of dubious validity.'”

Howitt v. Superior Court, 5 Cal. Rptr. 2d 196, 202 (App. 1992).

Get caught up with our ⁠Word of the Week⁠⁠ library.