#PACIFIC James Fanell, co-author of Embracing Communist China: America's Greatest Strategic Failure and government fellow at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, on his recommendations on how to counter China . @GORDONGCHANG, GATESTONE, NEWSWEEK, THE
The John Batchelor Show
John Batchelor
4.5 • 2.8K Ratings
🗓️ 23 May 2024
⏱️ 11 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
#PACIFIC James Fanell, co-author of Embracing Communist China: America's Greatest Strategic Failure and government fellow at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy, on his recommendations on how to counter China . @GORDONGCHANG, GATESTONE, NEWSWEEK, THE HIL
https://www.amazon.com/Embracing-Communist-China-Americas-Strategic/dp/1648210597/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?crid=SVI5QKVDH7ZQ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.3CuO3jl7d1hENlqXaYI1Kw.KJkeRg4eW-N9W9Ot0y7eRVaoCa8IXAU3S7fe2eAUdTI&dib_tag=se&keywords=Embracing+China+Fannell+thayer&qid=1716425180&s=books&sprefix=embracing+china+fannell+thayer%2Cstripbooks%2C123&sr=1-1-fkmr0
1900 Qing Dynasty
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is a CBS I on the world. I'm John Bachelor, |
| 0:08.0 | Gordon Chang, my colleague and co-host and we're very pleased to welcome |
| 0:11.0 | the author and our colleague James Finel, his new book |
| 0:14.4 | Embracing Communist China, America's Greatest Strategic Failure, written with his |
| 0:19.4 | colleague Bradley Thayer, identifies what is to be done and Jim has done us the favor of reducing |
| 0:26.1 | the immediate demands to five. Jim a very good evening to you thank you for |
| 0:31.6 | this US Navy Captain Retired Intelligence your opinion is valued |
| 0:38.0 | survivability number one what does that mean good evening to you |
| 0:42.0 | good evening John and Gordon, survivability means that, you know, there's kind of this perception that, you know, one bomb on one ship means that the ship is sunk and it's out of commission. And we know that that's just not true so it's worth |
| 0:55.1 | putting up front that Navy worships especially the ones today with you know have a |
| 1:01.9 | lot of extra work that's been put into them compared to World War II |
| 1:06.0 | era ships for compartmentalization and survivability, including defensive systems that go into the ships to be able to shoot down incoming |
| 1:16.3 | aircraft or missiles and whatnot. |
| 1:18.3 | So I think in that sense we need to make sure that, you know, when we talk about whether or not aircraft |
| 1:24.0 | carriers are survivable platform into the future that we just don't write it off |
| 1:27.9 | and say well they're you know kind of like what Billy Mitchell tried to do in the in the |
| 1:32.2 | 20s by saying that air power theory was the |
| 1:35.1 | dominant theory at that time and he was pushing saying that the navies were going to be |
| 1:39.5 | obsolete because of air power. |
| 1:41.2 | The same kind of mindset is in place today with missile power theory, |
| 1:45.3 | which is to say missiles can destroy anything at sea, and I think that's overstated. I think |
| 1:50.1 | it's very dangerous. The missiles, I'm not down-plated, just like air power's very dangerous the missiles. I'm not down-plaining just like air power is very |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from John Batchelor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of John Batchelor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

