OA826: Trump (Re-)Gagged, Ivanka Subpoenaed & SCOTUS Has D*cks on the Docket

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Atheist, Opinion, Harvard, News, Politics, Legal, Law, Liberal, Supremecourt

4.3 • 3.7K Ratings

🗓️ 30 October 2023

⏱️ 61 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Liz and Andrew tackle two stories. In the A segment, the duo discuss Trump's civil trial in New York and his (so far unsuccessful) efforts to block the gag order entered against him in federal court in DC. Then they break down a case headed for oral argument at the Supreme Court in a few days, Vidal v. Elster, which presents the unfortunately timely question of whether someone can trademark a joke about Donald Trump's... hands (without his permission).

SHOW NOTES

Trump DC docket

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148

Trump Reply Sup Stay of Gag Order

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.123.0_3.pdf

Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, 501 U.S. 1030 (1991)

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12991687764638238096

In re Brunetti

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14505087584960254163

15 USC § 1052

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1052

Vidal v. Elster petitioner’s brief

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-704/272918/20230725195926740_22-704tsUnitedStates.pdf

Vidal v. Elster opposition brief

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-704/278867/20230905184138600_Elster%20Merits%20Brief.pdf

OA 165

https://openargs.com/oa165-you-heard-it-here-first-abortion-rights-gun-control-and-offensive-trademarks/

-Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at [email protected]

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	So would you say you got a better shot at them going in and not so much coming out?
0:09.0	You could say that.
0:10.0	I did say that.
0:11.0	Would you say that?
0:14.0	Chester and I paid for his lawyers condo and Aspen and my lawyers condo and Maui.
0:19.0	They're very happy.
0:20.0	They're going to train once a year.
0:23.0	I'd love to sue them.
0:25.0	Only it would mean hiring another lawyer.
0:30.0	Meanwhile, at the Home of Justice, the super brand was...
0:33.0	Welcome to opening arguments.
0:35.0	The podcast that breaks down the law behind all the news stories you care about.
0:40.0	This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P. Andrew Torres, LLC,
0:45.0	for entertainment purposes, is not intended as legal advice,
0:49.0	and does not form an attorney client relationship.
0:52.0	Don't take legal advice from a podcast.
0:58.0	Hey guys, I'm Liz Dye with Mia's Andrew Torres,
1:00.0	and this is opening arguments, episode 826.
1:03.0	Hey Liz, how you doing?
1:05.0	I'm all right, I'm doing better than Pacer.
1:07.0	Thank you.
1:09.0	I like how we were discussing how, you know,
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.