OA779: Trump's a Target, MI Electors are Defendants & Judge Cannon Keeps Rolling (feat. Mitchell Epner)

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Atheist, Opinion, Harvard, News, Politics, Legal, Law, Liberal, Supremecourt

4.3 • 3.7K Ratings

🗓️ 20 July 2023

⏱️ 50 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Liz and Andrew invite back friend of the show Mitchell Epner to discuss the breaking news today that Jack Smith's Washington, DC grand jury has issued a "target letter" informing Donald Trump that he is likely to be indicted in connection with the January 6 investigation.

Find out exactly what all that means & much, much more!

This episode is an unpaid post on Patreon & was released a day early for all Patrons!

NOTES
Michigan AG Dana Nessel's press release
https://www.michigan.gov/ag/news/press-releases/2023/07/18/michigan-attorney-general-dana-nessel-charges-16-false-electors

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at [email protected]

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	I'll have you know, the contents of that dumpster are private.
0:07.6	You stick your nose in, you'll be violating attorney dumpster confidentiality.
0:11.3	I just want to say hello.
0:13.8	Oh, hello.
0:17.8	All right, we're done.
0:20.9	You think the language in the Second Amendment is clear enough, you know, about the right
0:23.9	to bear arms?
0:24.9	Of course, it's clear.
0:25.9	Every American has the right to hang a pair of bear arms on their wall.
0:29.0	How could that possibly be misconstrued?
0:30.8	All right, fantastic then.
0:32.6	Wait, you know what?
0:33.6	Before we send this to the printer, let's take that abortion thing out.
0:37.3	Oh, come on, I move for a hearing on the matter.
0:41.3	What?
0:42.3	You want me to have a special motion on the admissibility of the word asshole?
0:45.7	Well, let me have asked them.
0:47.5	That's close enough.
0:48.5	What law school did you go to?
0:49.5	I'll agree to it, Your Honor.
0:50.5	You will, why?
0:51.5	I don't want any interlocutorial appeals.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.