OA707: Peter Navarro Gets Spanked By Government In Presidential Records Case With Major Implications For Trump

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Atheist, Opinion, Harvard, News, Politics, Legal, Law, Liberal, Supremecourt

4.3 • 3.7K Ratings

🗓️ 14 March 2023

⏱️ 53 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today, Liz and Andrew break down the DOJ's sweeping win "in replevin" against Trump loyalist goon Peter Navarro. What's replevin? Why do we care? Listen and find out for this case that has significant implications for the Presidential Records Act, which in turn may have significant implications for any former Presidents who have refused to give back their Presidential records.

We begin with a terrifying development in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA, currently on the desk of Liz's sworn enemy, Judge Kacsmaryk.

Notes
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. the FDA
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65768749/alliance-for-hippocratic-medicine-v-us-food-and-drug-administration/?order_by=desc

Cato Institute on Navarro
https://www.cato.org/commentary/spectacular-economic-ignorance-peter-navarro

Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/chapter-22

Stern Letter to Navarro
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.245941/gov.uscourts.dcd.245941.1.4_1.pdf

DOJ Civil Division Letter to Navarro
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.245941/gov.uscourts.dcd.245941.1.6_1.pdf

Irving Letter
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.245941/gov.uscourts.dcd.245941.1.5_3.pdf

US v. Dean, 989 F.2d 1205 (D.C. Cir. 1993)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1562611946262688408

Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10520682160164643446

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and share our videos!

-Follow us on Twitter: @Openargs

-Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/openargs/

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed! @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at [email protected]!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	I'll have you know the contents of that dumpster are private.
0:07.6	You stick your nose in, you'll be violating attorney dumpster confidentiality.
0:11.6	I just want to say hello.
0:13.8	Oh, hello.
0:16.8	All right, we're done.
0:20.9	You think the language in the Second Amendment is clear enough?
0:23.3	You know about the right to bear arms?
0:24.8	Of course it's clear.
0:25.8	Every American has the right to hang a pair of bear arms on their wall.
0:29.0	Look at that possibly be misconstrued.
0:30.8	All right, fantastic then.
0:32.6	Wait, you know what?
0:33.6	Before we send this to the printer, let's take that abortion thing out.
0:37.3	Oh, come on, I move for a hearing on the matter.
0:41.5	What?
0:42.5	You want me to have a special motion on the admissibility of the word asshole?
0:45.7	Well, let me have asked them.
0:47.5	That's close enough.
0:48.5	What law school did you go to?
0:49.5	I'll agree to it with your honor.
0:50.5	You will, why?
0:51.5	I don't want any interlocutorial appeals.
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.