meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA354: A Russian Asset Sues What?

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Opinion, News, Liberal, Politics, Law, Harvard, Atheist, Legal, Supremecourt

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 28 January 2020

⏱️ 87 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode breaks down the (spoiler: ridiculous) defamation lawsuit filed by Tulsi Gabbard against Hillary Clinton for calling her (sort of) a "Russian asset." We do the patented Opening Arguments reading-the-complaint-backwards method (sort of) to figure out exactly what this means and what comes next.

We begin, however, with some instant response to the Saturday Republican "defense" of Trump in the impeachment proceedings. It's... well, it's a thing. Is Jay Sekulow still America's dumbest lawyer? (Hint: yes.) Learn the arguments that they're actually trying to advance, and why they're not actually a thing.

And again: please don't forget to CALL YOUR SENATOR! Remember, this is preposterously easy:

Call.  (202) 224-3121. 

CALL YOUR SENATORS, if you need help connecting to them, use
@resistbot.   Text the word RESIST to the
bot on Messenger, Twitter, Telegram, or to 50409 on SMS.  First time setup is quick, then calling both
should take 3-5 minutes.

Here’s what you say:

“I’d like to speak with Senator ____’s office.  Hi, I’m _____, I’m a constituent, and I’m
calling to ask Senator ____ to vote in favor of allowing the Senate to subpoena
documents and witnesses in the impeachment trial.  I don’t know how we can decide if Trump is
innocent or guilty without seeing all of the evidence.  Thank you.” 

Then, it's time to break down everything about Tulsi Gabbard's lawsuit. That means defamation law, Tulsi's lawyers, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, and much, much more. You'll be surprised to learn that Tulsi Gabbard's lawyers are... actual lawyers? But you'll also be surprised to learn some facts about them. Don't go all crazy conspiracy-theory on us, but... definitely listen.

After all that, it's time for the answer to #T3BE 163 involving contemporaneous notes and whether they're admissible as hearsay.

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. Check out Tulsi's defamation lawsuit here.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What kind of law do you practice?

0:04.0

Law, law, practice.

0:08.0

Maritime, maritime law.

0:11.0

Now what grounds could you possibly prevent?

0:22.0

Brown suitcases about grounds.

0:24.0

There's always come down to who the jury likes better.

0:31.0

Mr. Ferley, I'm sworn you that if you were jammed from Bannerag or bulldozers,

0:35.0

it would be better than Dimbeur.

0:37.0

You're not your good most pretty.

0:39.0

I never had any better than you.

0:45.0

A cash settlement.

0:47.0

I could have figured that out, you butted down maggot!

0:49.0

You have any cranes?

0:50.0

Oh, he is, of course.

0:51.0

Where are my men?

0:55.0

Welcome to opening arguments.

0:56.0

The podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with the real-life lawyer.

1:00.0

This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P.A.

1:03.0

Torres, LLC for Entertainment purposes, is not intended as legal advice

1:07.0

and does not form an attorney-client relationship.

1:09.0

Don't take legal advice from a podcast.

1:19.0

Hello and welcome to opening arguments.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.