meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA353: Duplicity and Impeachment

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Opinion, News, Liberal, Politics, Law, Harvard, Atheist, Legal, Supremecourt

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 24 January 2020

⏱️ 94 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode won't be a surprise; we're tackling all the developments in the impeachment trial of Donald J. Trump, including a deep dive into the trial brief filed by his cadre of (terrible) lawyers that alleges a strange new legal defense: "duplicity." Figure out what it all means & why there's so much reason to hope on today's show!

We begin with a letter a listener received from Sen. Todd Young and a call to action to each of you to CALL YOUR SENATORS. The Senate switchboard is (202) 224-3121. They'll connect you! For the Republicans, make this simple request (and be polite!):

“I’d like to speak with Senator ____’s office.  Hi, I’m _____, I’m a constituent, and I’m calling to ask Senator ____ to vote in favor of allowing the Senate to subpoena documents and witnesses in the impeachment trial.  I don’t know how we can decide if Trump is innocent or guilty without seeing all of the evidence.  Thank you.” 

For the Democrats, call them and thank them for their promise to vote for subpoenaing documents and witnesses. That's all! It's that easy and you can REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Then, it's time for the main segment, where we delve into all of the supposed "impeachment rules" -- do they really have to drink milk? -- and why S. Res. 438 gives us some reason for optimism.

After that, it's time to deconstruct the "cargo cult legal brief" filed by Trump's lawyers. How is it lying nonsense and what's the next bizarre and false argument they're going to make in the trial? We tell you! We also explore the legal doctrine of "duplicity," and show how... duplicitous that argument is in Trump's brief.

Then, of course, it's time for a brand-new #T3BE on contemporaneously recorded notes and hearsay. Will Thomas build on his three-question winning streak? Will you get it right? There's only one way to find out....

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. Rules: click here to read Riddick's Senate Procedure, and here for the just-adopted S. Res. 438.
  2. Strap in: this is the cargo cult Trump trial brief, and here are the House Articles of Impeachment.
  3. Remember that the two crimes covered by the Articles are bribery, 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2) (included in Art. I, Abuse of Power) and obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1505 (included in Art. II, Obstruction of Congress).
  4. Here's the interview reported by Politico in which Mulvaney conceded there was a quid pro quo (and "get over it")!
  5. Finally, if you really want to dig into "duplicity," check out U.S. v. Kearney, 451 F.Supp. 33 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What kind of law do you practice?

0:04.0

Law, law, law, and practice.

0:08.0

Maritime, maritime law.

0:11.0

Now what grounds could you possibly prevent?

0:22.0

Brown suitcases about grounds.

0:24.0

This always come down to who the jury likes better.

0:28.0

Mr. Ferley, I just warned you that if you were jammed from Danny Reg, or bulldozers,

0:35.0

this wouldn't be my living bill.

0:37.0

You're not your good most pretty.

0:39.0

I don't know, but you're not my best friend.

0:44.0

A cash settlement.

0:47.0

I could have figured that out, you butted down maggot!

0:49.0

You have any crane?

0:50.0

Oh, he is, of course, very highly mad at me.

0:54.0

Welcome to Opening Arguments, the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with the real-life lawyer.

1:00.0

This podcast is sponsored by the Law Offices of P. Antretoura as LLC for entertainment purposes.

1:05.0

It's not intended as legal advice, and does not form an attorney-client relationship.

1:09.0

Don't take legal advice from a podcast.

1:13.0

Hello, welcome to Opening Arguments.

1:20.0

Oh, this is going to be fun.

1:22.0

It's episode 353.

1:24.0

And no, that is not the Megatron voice.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.