meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Opening Arguments

OA335: This Week in Impeachment

Opening Arguments

Opening Arguments Media LLC

Opinion, News, Liberal, Politics, Law, Harvard, Atheist, Legal, Supremecourt

4.33.7K Ratings

🗓️ 22 November 2019

⏱️ 74 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today's episode breaks down the significance of a packed week in Republican witness testimony before the House Intelligence Committee about the potential impeachment of Donald Trump. We continue to place everything in the context of proving that Donald Trump committed impeachable bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2), including evaluating the (increasingly desperate) defenses being raised by House Republicans.

We begin, however, with a slight Andrew Was Wrong and some really interesting listener feedback about the 2019 Ukraine election.

Then, it's time to take a look at the week in impeachment, with a particular focus on Amb. Gordon Sondland, a Trump donor who was hand-picked to help run the "shadow foreign policy" in Ukraine, and exactly why he's such a devastating witness. We also tease apart the legality of the OMB hold and the crafting of the narrative to show the elements of bribery.

Then, it's time for a brief update on the Trump v. Mazars litigation and the significance of the administrative hold put in place by the Supreme Court. Does that mean John Roberts is 100% in the tank for Trump? (No.)

After all that, it's time for a NEW ERA in #T3BE as we move to a new set of questions! This one asks about a potential lawsuit for a guy who falls off his ladder. Did Thomas get it right? Listen and find out -- and play along with us on social media!

Appearances

None! If you’d like to have either of us as a guest on your show, drop us an email at openarguments@gmail.com.

Show Notes & Links

  1. Please do participate in our favorite charity event of the year, Vulgarity for Charity! To participate, just donate $50 or more to Modest Needs, and then send a copy of the receipt to vulgarityforcharity@gmail.com along with your request for a roast. You can even request that Thomas & Andrew roast the victim of your choice.
  2. Remember that this is all about Trump's bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2).
  3. Oh, the lies! We debunked the insane "the government secretly changed the whistleblower form" conspiracy back in Episode 320 and even created a handy link for you to share with Uncle Clarence to help convince him!
  4. On Trump v. Mazars, you can check out Trump's brief requesting a stay and the order issued by Chief Justice Roberts.

-Support us on Patreon at: patreon.com/law

-Follow us on Twitter:  @Openargs

-Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/openargs/, and don’t forget the OA Facebook Community!

-For show-related questions, check out the Opening Arguments Wiki, which now has its own Twitter feed!  @oawiki

-And finally, remember that you can email us at openarguments@gmail.com!

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

What's the first thing I want to do after we have a different president taking shower?

0:11.0

And impeachment is about cleansing the office.

0:22.0

Mind you the here to four document had had dry ink on it for at least many

0:35.6

fork nights here to we signed it a long time it was a long time ago side.

0:40.8

Welcome to opening arguments the podcast that pairs an inquisitive interviewer with

0:58.8

the real life lawyer this podcast is sponsored by the law offices of P.

1:02.5

and retort as LLC for entertainment purposes is not intended as legal advice and does not

1:07.4

form an attorney client relationship don't take legal advice from a podcast.

1:18.4

Hello and welcome to opening arguments this is episode three hundred thirty five I'm Thomas

1:22.3

Smith out of there is Andrew Torres.

1:24.4

How you doing Andrew?

1:26.2

I am fantastic Thomas how are you?

1:28.5

Well it's act three of the democratic clown show.

1:33.0

I'm sorry I just do in Devon newness welcome to the last that made for TV rip off of the

1:41.7

Russia ruse everybody yeah I got a lot of I actually watch that out all of it all of

1:48.6

the testimony and I'm testimony out I can't do it anymore but that was that was the impression

1:55.3

I got is just we get to see like a guy's wearing a white shirt and the democrats are like

1:59.6

well this person's clearing clearly wearing a white shirt and republicans not well hold

2:04.2

on hold on do you do who told you that and when did they did you go to the chain of command

2:10.8

to tell you about the white and it's it's there's only so much arguing and off you

2:16.5

skating about a fact pattern that's plain as day that I can take and I think I'm at my

2:21.7

limit so that's that's me how you do.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Opening Arguments Media LLC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Opening Arguments Media LLC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.