meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
More or Less: Behind the Stats

Numbers of 2021

More or Less: Behind the Stats

BBC

Business, Mathematics, Science, News Commentary, News

4.63.5K Ratings

🗓️ 26 December 2021

⏱️ 9 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A guide to the most concerning, striking and downright extraordinary numbers of 2021. Tim Harford asks three More or Less interviewees about their most significant and memorable figure over the past year. From the excess death toll of Covid-19; to declining total fertility rates, and a spike in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, we showcase the numbers that tell us something about the year gone by. During this programme, we speak to Hannah Ritchie, head of research at Our World in Data and senior researcher at the University of Oxford; Marina Adshade, Economics Professor at the University of British Columbia; and Heleen De Coninck, professor at Eindhoven University of Technology, and a lead author on several reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to more or less on the BBC World Service, where the programme that spends

0:12.4

our holiday season unwrapping one statistic at a time, and I'm Tim Harford.

0:19.3

It's become a tradition of ours to gather guests old and new to take a look back at the

0:23.4

most concerning peculiar or quite frankly extraordinary numbers of the year. Our first guest comes

0:31.1

from an organisation producing thousands of charts across hundreds of topics, so it's

0:36.8

safe to say she's got numbers at her fingertips.

0:40.1

I'm Dr Hannah Richey, I'm Head of Research at Our Road in Data and I'm a Senior Red Researcher

0:45.8

at the University of Oxford. My number of the year for 2021 is 12 million.

0:51.9

We're starting big. So the 12 million represents the estimated number of excess deaths that

0:57.8

occurred globally this year. That means 12 million more people died in 2021 than we'd

1:07.5

expect to see in a normal year. We've certainly had an extraordinary couple of years, at least

1:12.6

medically speaking, but can we attribute all of those extra deaths to Covid?

1:17.4

We should be careful not to directly attribute all of that to Covid.

1:22.2

Loyal more or less listeners may recall that measuring excess deaths is an alternative

1:26.8

way to estimate the impact of the pandemic. Rather than trying to attribute deaths to Covid,

1:32.8

you count any death from any cause and ask if there are more or fewer than in a typical

1:38.3

year. This is useful because it can be surprisingly difficult to determine what was the direct

1:43.8

Covid death and what wasn't. We know for example that due to lack of testing or under

1:50.1

reporting that we've probably missed a lot of deaths from Covid. In some countries we

1:55.0

just know that testing just has not been furrow enough to pick up all of the Covid infections

2:01.0

and therefore Covid deaths. On the other hand there is the additional issue that some people

2:06.3

might have died with a positive test result and therefore being counted as a Covid

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.