All right, Brian, we got a mailbag.

And we have some pretty good submissions in here.

We've seen them.

We've started to star some aside.

For you guys that are aware, if this is by chance your first ever mailbag, the way to submit a question, you put a mailbox emoji or you can put MB for mailbag.

We're going to go for about an hour and we're going to cycle through as many questions as we can. But I saw that we have some good ones in here to get us started here,

Brian. Also, super chats. We'll get bumped to the top if you want your question answered right

right away. Justin Kane, what do you think about blue chip ratio predicting wins and championships?

I mean, look, you need good players to win, right?

But the flaw in this has always been that people look at, okay, your blue chip ratio is X percent, so that means that you're winning. But what they don't take

no account is not every team is playing a four star at that position. So I pointed this out like

Ohio State in 2015 team had a couple five stars that hardly ever played or or like a guy like

Curtis Grant who was a five star who played like he was a solid player. But Darian Lee, who was a three-star, was their stud linebacker that year. And Josh Perry, who was a four-star, but not a top-hundred guy, was a better player than him, too. So you look, oh, five-stars. I'm like, well, yeah, he was a five star, but did he play like a five star? And I just don't think that that's necessarily something that, I think it's

important from the standpoint of, yes, you need it, but it's not as impactful as people make it

out to be. I mean, I'll just look at the one for CBS sports, but Elliott did, right? So Ohio State was 90%. Yeah, they were pretty good. Alabama was at 88%. They lost four games last year. Georgia was at 80%. Notre Dame was a 67%. Did it look like a 13% difference in talent between Notre Dame and Georgia this year? No, it didn't. Notre Dame was the more talented

team, but they had some guys that weren't ranked as high. Texas A&M was number four.

It's 79. They looked like they had a 12% more talented team than Notre Dame. Oklahoma was

ahead of Texas, 73 to 72. Does anyone want to argue with me that they have one of those higher

rate? No, they don't. You've got Florida in the top 15, Miami in the top 15. Miami and Penn State are on

the same level. Does anyone want to sit here and try to convince me that Miami has a more talented

team than Penn State? No. Some of these schools have inflated rates because of where they come from where they're

recruiting primarily from other schools have an inflated rate because of the fact that

...