By so hold from Christopher Crosby, although rarely considered the top tier two team by national analysts,

Notre Dame should be over Texas, Oregon, and others.

I buy that.

Look, I still, I have these kind of funny, just laugh at when people are sitting there making

the case about Steve Sarkesey and how great of a coach he is and how Texas is ahead of Notre Dame.

And I'm just like, based on what?

I just don't understand that, based on what?

And Steve Sarkisian in his 11 years as a head football coach has had two winning, who has had two seasons of 10 or more wins.

They came the last two years.

And he had a shootout went over

Clemson at home in the playoffs this year, needed overtime to beat Arizona State, and then

peed away a chance to tie the ball game up because Ohio State lost. And then by the way,

went 0 and 2 against Georgia. It's all built on, A,

Sarks likable, his offense is fun. He's an offensive genius. And it's all built on the fact

that they beat Alabama last year at Alabama. That's where it all comes down to. I think he's got a lot

more to prove to say his team is there than Notre Dame's. And then, of course, they have the high recruiting rankings because everybody obsesses on recruiting rankings. But that's still a pretty soft football team. And until that gets changed, that's going to be a concern of mine. Dan Lannie's another guy. Oh, he's so good. Oregon's so good. I'm like, all right, cool. Based on what? a one-point home win over Ohio State where you had to do some kind of weird 12 guys on the field thing to win that game.

And then when they got in a rematch, they curb stomped you.

You got owned by Kalin DeBoer in your tenure at Oregon before he left for Alabama.

What exactly about Dan Lanting?

You got beat 49 to 3 in your first game. Yeah, but

that was his first game. Okay, Marcus Freeman's first game was at Ohio State, a team that Georgia

beat by a point in the playoffs, and they lost by 11 in the game. They led to late in the third

...